The Rhodes bitch against Haringey Borough thread

[Rhodes]

Originally Posted By: Football Man

And how would he know it was ALL the money? Did you issue receipts that can be used as evidence to prove your innocence?

Football Man - That is another unwarranted accusation and a further unreserved apology is required, why wouldn't it be all the money as I'm as honest as the day is long. I was even putting my own money into the Club and you may have read previously that I was cruelly conned out of £640 by one of the players which, had 'Sugar' been an honourable man, he would have reimbursed me.

[NeutralFan]

Originally Posted By: Greg_Dyke

He doesnt need to prove his innocence..

INNOCENT UNTIL PROVEN GUILTY !!

Best hope I'm not on the jury then!

[shyboy]

More to the point Football man how did the secretary know it wasnt all the money.You cant accuse Rhodes of theft without proof.On this topic Rhodes has the moral high ground and deserves an apolgy.

[Football Man]

Originally Posted By: Rhodes

Originally Posted By: Football Man

And how would he know it was ALL the money? Did you issue receipts that can be used as evidence to prove your innocence?

Football Man - That is another unwarranted accusation

No it isn't. It's a couple of questions. Probably questions that we can add to the ever growing list of those that you have been asked on this forum and never answered.

[Football Man]

Originally Posted By: shyboy

More to the point Football man how did the secretary know it wasnt all the money.

I never said he did.

[Rhodes]

Football Man - It is interesting that you have dug your own grave with these unfounded allegations and the good Forum members, other than the usual suspects, have rallied round in no uncertain terms. I think it is a victory for the poor man on the street as all the surplus money I had went into Haringey Borough yet you incredibly accuse me of taking a backhander.

On a seperate issue here is another abominable extract from an e-mail 'Sugar' sent me last year prior to my departure from the Club, why do you choose to defend a man like that who is slowly but surely being exposed for the cruel dictator he is:

 

'You have been expelled from the club and as a consequence of you comments to me this morning I wish to make it absolutely clear that you are no longer welcome at the club in any capacity whatsoever. I cannot stop you going to away games but you will not be allowed access to the ground again. I want your keys on Thursday when you will be allowed to enter the ground and deliver them to me'.

 

 

[PB!]

What were your comments to him that morning Mr Rhodes?

 

 

[Pagey]

Either Sugar is a complete ar$se or Rhodes really wound him up

 

Come on Rhodes put some more on

[Rhodes]

Paulb - Lol, wouldn't you like to know but I'm sure they are still ringing in his ears.

[PB!]

LOl wouldnt mind knowing, probably best we get both sides of the story. So what were your comments to him that day??

[Rhodes]

Paulb - I have already 'published' some of the e-mail I sent to 'Sugar' in an earlier post and here is a further extract, we had a brief discussion on the phone however he cowardly slammed it down on me which I gather is something he is good at when he doesn't get his own way and people don't cave in to his silly threats:

 

'For your information you will not be able to prevent me from coming to the ground to watch matches next season unless a Court order is obtained, the premises are owned by the Local Authority and I will liaise with them on the issue if need be. Furthermore I would be grateful if John could e-mail me a copy of the Club rules at his earliest convenience so I can see which rules were breached if any prior to my expulsion from the Football Club'.

 

 

[PB!]

But what did you say to him that day? What were these said comments??

[Rhodes]

Do you mean verbally over the phone

[PB!]

The comments Sugar talked about in his email to you that made him take his decided course of action.

[Rhodes]

Paulb - I don't really recall what I said to 'Sugar' over the phone as it was over a year ago now, I think it was probably the contents of my e-mails that got his back up as he hates people standing up to him and questionning his authority, he's basically a coward like all dictators. The same thing happened with 'our' former Manager Julian Hudson who went on to Manage Ruislip Manor briefly (yes Lato briefly), he had an argument with 'Sugar' over something quite trivial and, rather than sorting it out man to man or using mediation, 'Sugar' immediately showed him the door.

[Pagey]

any progress with the police Rhodes ?

[Jeff Hamnett TSF]

Ive only just caught up on the latest posts and I am appalled at footballmans allegations of backhanders.

 

I see that when he was questioned on here about it he didnt have anything to back it up.

 

Unfortunately footballman you are coming across as a bully and coward.

 

 

[Football Man]

I think you'll find, thespursfan, that I was just clarifying with clip Rods that it wasn't a reason for him getting the sack (hence the question mark at the end of the sentence). However, in his usual manner, he jumped to a conclusion and waded in head first.

[Rhodes]

Football Man - If that was the case, and it's a big if, you have changed your tune as I think you have insinuated from day one that I was shown the door for being responsible for the fire, you have all but suggested that I poured the petrol over everything under the stand and set light to it myself. Like I said you have a way with words so you are easily able to mislead members who are not so afluent in the English language by twisting things, I am still waiting for my unreserved apology by the way.

[Football Man]

Originally Posted By: Rhodes

I think you have insinuated from day one that I was shown the door for being responsible for the fire

Where have I ever said this?

Originally Posted By: Rhodes

you have all but suggested that I poured the petrol over everything under the stand and set light to it myself.

Where have I ever suggested anything close to this?