Should NF stop posting in-appropriate material???

[Football Man]

Was that an intentional pun?

[Rhodes]

Originally Posted By: paulb

Who sent these Pms Rhodes??

Obviously I'm not at liberty to say but one distinguished member of the SSML Forum was very vocal and said that NeutralFan was totally out of order particularly as you divulged recently that, like you, he is a married man.

[PB!]

Didnt read his post in reply then that he isnt married.

 

Ha brilliant Bullshit again from Rhodes, I reckon noone has pmd him about this as everyone else just sees it as harmless fun. Unilke a married man trying to arrange meets, get numbers with every female on here.

[3praise]

Although PaulB he hasnt tried it on with HTFCew YET!!!!

[ONE]

so rather than post their dislike to NF's light hearted fun they pm you !?...hmmm....bunch of tits !

[HTFCew]

Originally Posted By: 3praise

Although PaulB he hasnt tried it on with HTFCew YET!!!!

He did - quite a long time ago. I told him I was washing my hair.

[PB!]

HTFC One I think its all a big lie!!!!!!

[Greg_Dyke]

but a beautiful lie, nonetheless

 

[Rhodes]

Originally Posted By: paulb

HTFC One I think its all a big lie!!!!!!

If you like I will post some of the PM's I received with no reference to the originator's, will that be proof. Even Lato said publically that I had a point and it's obvious that NeutralFan was out of order to keep posting the images on virtually every thread, it was un-necessary.

[PB!]

Lol but good harmless fun!!!

 

 

[Football Man]

Originally Posted By: Rhodes

it's obvious that NeutralFan was out of order to keep posting the images on virtually every thread, it was un-necessary.

clip Rods, NF had posted those images as his signature. Therefore, they appeared on every post he wrote and, when he changed his signature, they all disappeared. Hadn't you worked that out?

[Football Man]

Originally Posted By: Rhodes

If you like I will post some of the PM's I received with no reference to the originator's, will that be proof.

No, it won't. Without reference to the originators (which I am fully aware you cannot do under protocol) they won't mean a thing because you will probably have written them yourself, Kanu-style.

[Rhodes]

Okay, well I will ask the originators whether they are content for me to divulge their names, I don't see why they should have any objection other than risking ruffling NeutralFan's feathers and falling out with him which I wouldn't have thought would be the end of the World.

[Greg_Dyke]

Originally Posted By: Rhodes

Okay, well I will ask the originators whether they are content for me to divulge their names, I don't see why they should have any objection other than risking ruffling NeutralFan's feathers and falling out with him which I wouldn't have thought would be the end of the World.

they dont have to....IT'S AN ANONYMOUS POLL !!!

[Rhodes]

I'm talking about the PM's I have received in support of my stance, anyway don't you agree that NeutralFan's images were school playground stuff, it took me back to when I was twelve or thirteen giggling over pictures of women's breasts.

[AWK]

To be fair to Rhodes I do think he had a point, I've no problem with his links but I can understand why Rhodes thought that by having the pictures in his signature then it could well be inappropriate should you be in a cyber cafe or library reading the board.

[Rhodes]

Thanks for that AWK, I rest my case.