The new Tommy Lambourne thread

[Football Man]

I've started this thread as the old one was getting too long (all hate eating references can be transferred to this thread too, if people prefer).

 

What's the "opinion on the streets" as to where Tommy will end up next. Do people think he will find another Premier Division club or take a drop in standard and play for one of the Div 1 clubs?

[saf06]

i havent even heard of this tommy lamborne-who cares!!!!

[Football Man]

Quote:

Potters Bar Town FC said:
(all hate eating references can be transferred to this thread too, if people prefer).

That should, of course, have said HAT eating. Bloody keyboard!!!

[RH1]

Quote:

saf06 said:
i havent even heard of this tommy lamborne-who cares!!!!

I'm sure you haven't heard of a lot of people saf, doesn't mean they are not worth talking about.
Although I'm sure Rhodes thinks that Lambourne is worth talking about.

On the where will he go next discussion, I'll throw another possibility into the ring, maybe he will stay at Ruislip a little longer?
Has he been deregistered? If not maybe he will be seen in a Ruislip shirt again soon, after all he was cup tied against Potton!

[NeutralFan]

He's been playing in the division ABOVE you Saf..

[Rhodes]

Potters Bar Town - I would be interested to know who gave you the authority to initiate a new thread when one, originated by myself, already existed, did you get Ian's permission to do this as you certainly didn't ask mine. If you did not consult with Ian I may be forced to take the matter further as it is simply not on, when you say that the original thread had become too long that is not for you to decide. There could also be legal implications against you if, for example, Spidermanor unwisely decides to initiatite proceedings against me following my justified comments yesterday about Tommy Lambourne's treatment at Ruislip Manor. I look forward to receiving your explanation and will cc this post to Ian in a PM for his information.

[Football Man]

Quote:

Rhodes said:
Potters Bar Town - I would be interested to know who gave you the authority to initiate a new thread when one, originated by myself, already existed, did you get Ian's permission to do this as you certainly didn't ask mine. If you did not consult with Ian I may be forced to take the matter further as it is simply not on, when you say that the original thread had become too long that is not for you to decide. There could also be legal implications against you if, for example, Spidermanor unwisely decides to initiatite proceedings against me following my justified comments yesterday about Tommy Lambourne's treatment at Ruislip Manor. I look forward to receiving your explanation and will cc this post to Ian in a PM for his information.

Getting a bit repetitive aren't we, Rhodes? Why on earth would I want to seek permission from either Ian or you to start a new thread? Personally, I think you've made yourself look stupid enough on this forum without emphasising it in a PM to Ian but, if you do write to him, tell him that I'm looking forward to meeting him next Tuesday evening.

[Spidermanor]

 

 

Quote:

Rhodes said:

Potters Bar Town - I would be interested to know who gave you the authority to initiate a new thread when one, originated by myself, already existed, did you get Ian's permission to do this as you certainly didn't ask mine. If you did not consult with Ian I may be forced to take the matter further as it is simply not on, when you say that the original thread had become too long that is not for you to decide. There could also be legal implications against you if, for example, Spidermanor unwisely decides to initiatite proceedings against me following my justified comments yesterday about Tommy Lambourne's treatment at Ruislip Manor. I look forward to receiving your explanation and will cc this post to Ian in a PM for his information.

 

For information, here are the forum rules:

 

Registration as a User implies acceptance of the following terms and conditions:

- Participants shall not post any material likely to cause offence, that is protected by copyright, trademark or other proprietary right - without the express permission of the owner of such copyright - or that contains personal phone numbers or addresses.

- Participants may not use the Forums to post or transmit advertisements or commercial solicitations of any kind.

- The appropriate Forum Moderator has the right to edit, censor, delete or otherwise modify any posted message.

- This web site does not verify or guarantee the accuracy of the material posted to the Forums or bear any responsibility for any loss, damage, or other liabilities caused by any posted message.

 

Nothing there about new threads is there, however there is a section warning posters not to make comments which cause offence. You are still to justify/provide ANY evidence to back up your offensive claims of maltreatment of a player at Ruislip manor FC. So now that I continue to call your bluff and won't go away you are starting to get threatening as well/ Please call Ian in I'd welcome his opinion on your and my comments. Please though bear in mind the content of many of your posts.

 

ps I'm still waiting for that apology Rhodes

[jayjay]

Quote:

Rhodes said:
Potters Bar Town - I would be interested to know who gave you the authority to initiate a new thread when one, originated by myself, already existed, did you get Ian's permission to do this as you certainly didn't ask mine. If you did not consult with Ian I may be forced to take the matter further as it is simply not on, when you say that the original thread had become too long that is not for you to decide. There could also be legal implications against you if, for example, Spidermanor unwisely decides to initiatite proceedings against me following my justified comments yesterday about Tommy Lambourne's treatment at Ruislip Manor. I look forward to receiving your explanation and will cc this post to Ian in a PM for his information.

<img src="/forum/images/graemlins/sleeping.gif" alt="" />zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz

[saf06]

Quote:

NeutralFan said:
He's been playing in the division ABOVE you Saf..

sorry mate i was playing in that league not to long ago but had to quit broxbourne because i had no means of transport to get up there-and no way am i geting a train up there 3 times a week.....plus i was playing for wingate and finchley but left them due to a disagreement with the gaffer....so im not to sure hat u were trying to imply there neatural fan????

[Rhodes]

Saf - Was your gaffer at Wingate and Finchley Adam Lee.

[saf06]

yea!!!

[Rhodes]

I know him well, what was your difficulty with him.

[saf06]

wasnt really with him-the coach didnt like my attitude i dont fink......he went on holiday during pre season and the coach frezzed me out ....he obviuosly thought i wasnt good enough-but.....all the team and adam liked me and fort i was good enough

[Lato]

Quote:

Rak said:

Quote:

saf06 said:
i havent even heard of this tommy lamborne-who cares!!!!

I'm sure you haven't heard of a lot of people saf, doesn't mean they are not worth talking about.
Although I'm sure Rhodes thinks that Lambourne is worth talking about.

On the where will he go next discussion, I'll throw another possibility into the ring, maybe he will stay at Ruislip a little longer?
Has he been deregistered? If not maybe he will be seen in a Ruislip shirt again soon, after all he was cup tied against Potton!

I'm not sure if he has been deregistered yet, a good point Rak. Yes he was cup tied v Potton,and I guess he could play for Manor again this season. Although as I said before I don't know the full story and at the end of the day the manager picks the squad.

[Lato]

rhodes, you never told me why you spies who know what Lambourne,Kalu and Barker have for breakfast each day didn't tell you that the players could be leaving Ruislip Manor.

[Rhodes]

Lato - Well I knew that infact I thought they had all already left, I won't say anymore for risk of having Spidermanor on my back again, tell him he should lighten up a bit when you see him at the Vase replay tomorrow night.

[Lato]

So why didn't you say so on here. Unlike you to miss an opportunity to BIG it up on here. As far as I can tell Spider is justified in his comments to you as you have caused offence unnecessary by again simply not thinking before typing.

 

I notice and appreicate your apology with regard to the Nazis/Oswiecim comments (though I still don't understand the point you were trying to make)and appreciate that you saw the error of your ways with regard to that.

[Rhodes]

I thought it was common knowledge that the three former Haringey players had already left Grosvenor Vale in disgust at not being given a fair crack of the whip, that's not a criticism by the way as these things happen in football such as at Upton Park with their Argentinian duo. My reference to the atrocities of WWII was not intended to cause offence and I felt was blown out of all proportion, I was just trying to get a point across to InformationZone2. For your information my Father was one of the first into Germany with the Marines following their surrender in 1945 and it effected him for the rest of his life.

[Lato]

You miss my point as usual rhodes, but we'll let it rest. I got one retraction out of you so I'll leave it at that.