Weymouth MOM

[David Holden]

Voting is now open on the website.

[fleetboy123]

opinel-thought he played great

[Nagasaki]

Mark Ricketts for me, he did get undone for pace by the dreaded Elam for the winner, but Sachas initial lunge did not help matters, after that there was still a long way to go before danger struck and sadly you have to say well done Elam.

 

But its Mark Ricketts for me, he gets on quietly with what he knows best and is fast becoming a very valuable member to the team.

_________________

Dont you think - Lifes just great

 

<img src="/forum/images/graemlins/applaus.gif" alt="" /> <img src="/forum/images/graemlins/applaus.gif" alt="" /> <img src="/forum/images/graemlins/applaus.gif" alt="" />

[Slartibartfast]

Was that Mark? Elam attacked down our left and Mark rarely ventures over there.

[jc]

Yep - the defence really was pulled out of position for the winning goal.

[Slartibartfast]

In that case he did pretty well getting across there, a cynic would say that he should probably have fouled the b*gg*r and taken the yellow but it doesn't seem right to critisise someone for not cheating.

I thought overall it was a good performance but despite the amount of possession we had we didn't create enough chances and weren't clinical enough when we did.

Weymouth had one good chance and scored two goals we had three good chances and scored one.

All told it confirms the belief that we will still be playing Conference football next season, too good for relegation not good enough for the play-offs.....what did the pope say about limbo?

[Nagasaki]

Quote:

Slartibartfast said:
Was that Mark? Elam attacked down our left and Mark rarely ventures over there.

Credit due where its due Mark Ricketts for me Slarti.

<img src="/forum/images/graemlins/thumbsup.gif" alt="" /> <img src="/forum/images/graemlins/thumbsup.gif" alt="" />

[Nagasaki]

Quote:

Slartibartfast said:
In that case he did pretty well getting across there, a cynic would say that he should probably have fouled the b*gg*r and taken the yellow but it doesn't seem right to critisise someone for not cheating.
I thought overall it was a good performance but despite the amount of possession we had we didn't create enough chances and weren't clinical enough when we did.
Weymouth had one good chance and scored two goals we had three good chances and scored one.
All told it confirms the belief that we will still be playing Conference football next season, too good for relegation not good enough for the play-offs.....what did the pope say about limbo?

Ever hopeful we may still improve. What do you think?

<img src="/forum/images/graemlins/boxing.gif" alt="" /> <img src="/forum/images/graemlins/boxing.gif" alt="" /> <img src="/forum/images/graemlins/boxing.gif" alt="" />

[Stu M]

Quote:

Slartibartfast said:what did the pope say about limbo?

Purgatory are next...

[Slartibartfast]

I can understand the church changing its stance on the earth being flat and being the centre of the universe once science had disproved it, though not without persecuting a few scientists first of course, I can understand the church rescinding its views on creationism giving the overwhelming evidence of evolution that even the most ardent born again bible basher finds impossible to refute, but when the Pope dismisses selected religious beliefs as being 'mere hypothesis' surely whatever religion you believe in you are going to start thinking well if we rule out 'mere hypothesis' there isn't an awful lot left.

[Stu M]

That's what happens when you allow FGR's Colin Peake to go routing around inside Catholic doctrine though, Slarti!

[Harry J Allstars]

Quote:

Slartibartfast said:
I can understand the church changing its stance

I can't, they either follow those opinions or they don't. If they do they should follow the bible to the law, that involves not being able to drive as your not allowed to drive without having car insurance and insurance is nothing but gambling, or they should say oh well perhaps Christianity’s wrong then?