Comments to CHRIS KINNEAR

[Guest]

702 at Stonebridge Road last night. GNFC going down the pan. Will have to sell their best players soon. Shame.

 

One hears that Jay Saunders is coming back to MFC

[Hempstead Gaz]

Can you afford the fee will will ask, as he is on a contract?

[Guest]

yes

[jc]

Quote:

Anonymous said:
702 at Stonebridge Road last night.

That's a disgraceful understatement... it was 706. <img src="/forum/images/graemlins/wink.gif" alt="" />

[MargateFan]

706 on a rainy Monday night sounds pretty fair to me.

[Paul H]

I should listen to tony m anon. Im one of his players and am totally behind him on this one. You see our team is being rebuilt and for the first time on sunday we started to look like a good team. It took us 4 games but now results are starting to come and everyone's getting used to playing together. Ck's got the same sort of problem. I for one was playing football out of the area but knew that tony is well respected and knows his football locally so I wanted to be part of it. To upset him is a little stupid mate! What im trying to say is

ANON -

YOU ARE A PILLOCK!

<img src="/forum/images/graemlins/attentat.gif" alt="" />

[Guest]

I'm really upset at these comments. Please do not be so abusive. Children have access to this forum. <img src="/forum/images/graemlins/bawling.gif" alt="" />

[American FLEET FAN No1]

Quote:

Anonymous said:
I'm really upset at these comments. Please do not be so abusive. Children have access to this forum. <img src="/forum/images/graemlins/bawling.gif" alt="" />

Seems children sometimes post as well! <img src="/forum/images/graemlins/grin.gif" alt="" />

[zhukov]

The relegation from the Conference was not based on the playing performance of the club but because of the ground sharing situation.

The relegation from Conference South was based on our poor playing performance. However for the majority of that season CK could not sign players because of the FA embargo. CK had to play those players who were fit and on many occasions those who were not fit out of position just to be able to field a team to fulfil a fixture.

It is to the credit of those players last season and CK and Kevin Raines that they stayed with us in the perilous situation of the club.

During last season many of the supporters were turning up expecting to see the club's last game.

It is not easy to turn a club round especially

if a club is seen to be in difficulties because it is very difficult to attract and sign good quality players.

If you put the club's situation in an overall context we are making steady and purposeful progress to having a successful team.

I have every confidence in CK and for his loyalty we owe him our backing.

[Guest]

You keep on saying that Zuckov! I dont see where anyone apart from the odd one is disagreeing with you. As I see it this thread was purely to have a question and answer session with the manager. Bearing in mind that sometimes there is a lack of information on the footballing front on the front page cant see any harm in this. Seems to me this is to bring the fans and the manager together thats all. Other clubs do it and it cant be a bad thing can it. I cant see where any contradiction or critisism of the manager is mentioned or intimated. It would be good PR.

[zhukov]

I am sure that there will be an open session with CK present to answer questions which will be good PR.

 

On this thread there have been 14 posts from "anonymous". I am sure that they are not all from the same person. This makes it difficult to have a proper, reasonable and friendly discussion about a topic, the outcome of which could be beneficial to all concerned including the club itself.

I do not want to know a poster's personal identity but it would be useful to have have some indication so that you can reply to the same poster. At present the forum has too many posters using "anonymous" which makes a sensible discussion very difficult.

Cannot the anonymous posters use some identity whilst maintaining their privacy?

After all we are not discussing state secrets.