Landlords consent

[Cookie]

Reading through the KM today Ezekiel says that the club do not have landlords consent to and that it is required to re-instate the pitch to a playable level.

Was yesterdays meeting between the club and the council and the so-called agreement by the council to go along with this, them actually giving their consent.

Excuse me if I have missed something but didnt we already HAVE the landlords consent as mentioned on numerous occasions by Mr. Ezekiel.He has said on many occasons that if we had the finance we could build immediately,indeed he has stated that we could have done this months ago. Am a bit confused here. Can someone clear this up in my mind for me please.

[Guest]

The KM piece would have been written before yesterday's meeting.

[Cookie]

Thank you. So yesterdays meeting was about getting their consent then. How does that explain then the previous statements by S.E. about going ahead if financed.Wasn't that already consent given?

[Guest]

I would have to see the exact statements to give an opinion on that. Maybe he was a bit peeved that we made our statement last week about returning to Hartsdown unilaterally. As you know, yesterday's statement was a joint statement.