first 5 to offload???

[Guest]

OK after the 5 to keep, now we have the first 5 to dump, and yes we all know there are more than 5 we would like to get rid off!!!

[Matt]

Yeah I saw Brazil on Sky Sports Soccer Saturday quite a while ago spouting off about how Slough is a 'good little club' with 'lots of potential'. I'm not sure if I've ever seen him at the ground. What's the use of being associated with the club if he never does anything?

[Greengrass]

First 5 to offload:

Ullathorne- i dont think he has the right attitude to the club.

Wilkinson- Not up to the standards.

Haynes- Absolute c**p

Mautone- Absolute c**p

Browne- PLEASE!

[Matt]

I must disagree with Haynes. I think he's a very good WINGER but not a very good STRIKER or DEFENDER or wherever else Browne plays him. At the end of the day it's the ineptitude of the manager that has a big part to play in whether players are 'good' or 'crap' (as well as the wages saga)

[Guest]

Haynes is very good when played in the correct position.

[BARRINGTON]

Gilkes,Gilkes,Gilkes,Gilkes and yes you've guessed it GILKES

[Guest]

To go, Kemp, Brown, Both Deaners, Brazil if he is still associated with the club as he seems to have absolutley no interest in it, despite the potential influence he could make at the club.

[Guest]

Browne, gilkes, daly, Junior the new player, Kemp<p>How can anyone want to get rid of Ullers who with hakki and Howard have been our best signings,<p>Ullers needs to play up front, he is a back to the goal nudge and flick player, not out of position in midfield. I also have a suspicion he has been playing injured for the good of the club.

[Guest]

When Ullathorne arrived, and played up front, he was a revelation, but has been off the boil for some time.Maybe he is injured, maybe he only plays when paid, or perhaps its Browne's determination to play certain players out of position.<p>Ullathorne anywhere near his best is well worth keeping.