Michael Jackson

[YB941 5thD EFM ~soul~]

Whether he's been fiddling with them or not, he's a 40 year old bloke who sleeps in the same bed as pre-pubescent kids, which is fking weird if you ask me.

 

Reckon he could be in pretty big trouble for this one. His best mate Uri reckons he'll end up topping himself.

 

Wouldn't be too bothered. He's been shít since the Bad album.

 

 

[EFM The Firm, The Voice]

Somebody made a point once that he's living his life in reverse, because he spent all his childhood being a adult as such, now he doesn't have to work and stuff he's living his childhood.

[YB941 5thD EFM ~soul~]

I bet Gary Glitter wish he'd thought of that one. <img src="/images/graemlins/frown.gif" alt="" />

 

Seriously though, if the average 40 year old on the street admitted he enjoyed sleeping in the same bed as 10-year-old boys, you'd probably be tempted to smack the bloke.

 

 

[Claire!]

Zeal I comlpetely agree with you, that it's strange a 40 year old sleeping in the same bed as a 12 year old.

 

However, i do not believe that he has done anything, but being niave. He has a new album coming out, and it seems as though it is a crime called blackmail that is being committed here.

[EFM The Firm, The Voice]

12yr old girls ..... now thats a different matter <img src="/images/graemlins/wink.gif" alt="" />

[Claire!]

LOL! EFMTFTV!!! Yuo can't say that!!!

[ESG]

 

he just did

 

re jacko

the thing is, its not the first time

hopefully the parents involved will stick to their guns and not go down the compensation route..

 

 

[CANV EFM]

everyone and everything has a price these days.. how sad

[EFM The Firm, The Voice]

Even 12yr old girls .... bloody expensive, let me tell you <img src="/images/graemlins/wink.gif" alt="" />

[CANV EFM]

not in thailand

[ESG]

 

interesting that ITV pulled their apologist scheduled programme as soon as the allegations broke

[Northern Monkey]

Quote:

Claire! said:
However, i do not believe that he has done anything, but being niave.

Jazus he is 45 , he has been in the crap re this before how naive can he be. The bloke is a nonce, end of story.
I reckon they will nail him this time, criminal trial then the family will sue for damages. <img src="/images/graemlins/angry.gif" alt="" />

[EFM's Librarian]

You've got to wonder about the families who say - "I know lets send little Jimmy off to see his friend Michael Jackson this weekend"

[Chubbhead EFM]

I can't wait for all those Jacko fans to come out and defend him. Feckin' hell, I love Oasis but if Noel Gallagher said that he shared his bed with young boys, I certainly wouldn't then defend him, as jacko's more obssessed fans continue to do.

 

As for the man being naive, I don't buy it at all. Just look at the fortune he's amassed over the years (although I know he's had some help in gaining it). If a bloke is smart enough to do that, then surely he must be able to see that admitting to sharing your bed with 12 year olds ain't the best publicity route to take.

 

I reckon that he's gonna get done for this one though. During the last trial in 1993, his popularity was still high, but it's been waining for years and most of the pblic won't give a [***!!***] if a washed up pop star goes to jail (look at Gary Glitter!), therefore public opinion won't effect the trial (if it comes to that) as much as it did before and people won't be so willing to jump to his defence this time. Also, Jacko was never cleared in regards to the last accusations, so that'll probably get reopened. He's going DAHN!

[The Hooded Man]

I struggle to believe that he's that stupid, considering that this is not the first time that allegations were set against him. It doesn't take genius to work out, that if you were accused of something in the past, your hardly going to risk trying it again, barring in mind the fiasco the previous allegations coursed, but I could be wrong so don't all start tearing at my throat.

 

I'm not a Jackson Fan.

 

[Claire!]

Of course i do not believe a 40+ years old man shoud have young boys round to "sleep over", but he is niave in the way that he trusts most people.

 

But look at the children's parents, they know about past allegations, and yet they still allow their child to sleep over knowing that they will be sleeping in his bed.

 

They fully knew the allegations that he has been under before and allowed their child to continue to sleep round his house.

 

If i was a parent, there is absultuly no way that i would put my child in any sort of danger.

 

Yes, i do believe that Michael is niave, and too trusting, but i would not allow my child to visit him on sleep overs, my thoughts are what are the parents thinking letting their child stay over?

[EFM The Firm, The Voice]

As long as I could go on the rollercoaster I'd sleep with Micheal Jackson <img src="/images/graemlins/wink.gif" alt="" />

[CANV EFM]

they are thinking we can get 6 million odd dollars out of this.. maybe they should be the ones in cuffs?

[EFM's Librarian]

Just heard this morning that he's out on $3 million bail - this seems really odd to me. $3 million dollars is a tiny amount to him, what's to now stop him from flying out to a country that has no extradition treaty with the US, and disappearing forever? (not that that wouldn't be a good thing!)

 

Same with Phil Spector - out on $1million bail. If you're that rich and you think there's a fair chance you'll be spending the next few years in prison, what incentive do you have not to skip bail?

[Claire!]

Quote:

EFM's Librarian said:
Just heard this morning that he's out on $3 million bail - this seems really odd to me. $3 million dollars is a tiny amount to him, what's to now stop him from flying out to a country that has no extradition treaty with the US, and disappearing forever? (not that that wouldn't be a good thing!)

he had to surrender his passport so he wouldn't be able to fly away. Plus he is one of the world's most famous people, he wouldn't be able to hide anywhere in the world!