Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support Fans Focus by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content

3G pitch debate


OldTowner

Recommended Posts

Voice of Reason, thanks for that.

 

Seriously though, how does the Desso pitch at Wembley fit on your scale. The grass had to be ripped up 10 times I believe as it was unsatisfactory for football. So now it is semi artificial. I am not sure about it myself, no doubt we will see how it plays this evening!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In a perfect world all football would be played on a perfect grass pitch but we live in the real world and that isn't possible.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree that perfect grass is the best, but if that is not possible what then?

 

I had not realised that Wembley is by no means the only semi-artificial pitch used in top English football. The following club pitches are also using the Desso Hybrid surface: Arsenal, Villa, Cardiff, Liverpool, Man City, Swansea, and Spurs.

 

The aim must surely be to get the best surface reasonably possible in  order that the best football can be played.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If perfect grass is not possible, then the best grass that can reasonably be maintained is preferable in my mind to any synthetic cop out. Of course you wouldn't need tireless work from a groundsman if you had a tippy tap pitch, but the same is true if it was made of concrete, because neither is what competitive football should be played on.

 

Where portions of a pitch are repaired artificially, that is to allow the majority of the natural surface to perform well, not to present an artificial surface. It is a temporary measure until the preferred situation can resume.

 

Club loyalty means few fans with a tippy tap pitch will speak negatively about it. The 'best; football is . of course, highly subjective and some may believe that an unpredictable surface produces more errors, excitement and a need to adapt to conditions, which could be seen as better football. (Others will, of course, disagree and will, no doubt have their very own reasons for doing so!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We all have an Old Fashioned side to us and i'd like to see every club playing on 'Real' grass only. The inconsistent surfaces and different playing conditions are all part of the beutiful game. therefore all clubs should be given decent grants for excellent drainage systems which prevent games like ours recently, being called off.

 

All Community Charter Status Non league clubs should also be given preference and funding to develope their own 3g training facilities so that childrens/Youth football can always be played for their development rather than being inactive from the recent 3 months of excess rainfall.

 

Where there is a will there is a way but the local authority decision makers are all talk and no action, it makes me vommit when you hear West Ham and Man City are GIVEN FREE stadiums to play in, yet our voluntarily run and organised set up are made to scrape around to survive.

Edited by Enfield United
Link to comment
Share on other sites

We all have an Old Fashioned side to us and i'd like to see every club playing on 'Real' grass only. The inconsistent surfaces and different playing conditions are all part of the beutiful game. therefore all clubs should be given decent grants for excellent drainage systems which prevent games like ours recently, being called off.

 

All Community Charter Status Non league clubs should also be given preference and funding to develope their own 3g training facilities so that childrens/Youth football can always be played for their development rather than being inactive from the recent 3 months of excess rainfall.

 

Where there is a will there is a way but the local authority decision makers are all talk and no action, it makes me vommit when you hear West Ham and Man City are GIVEN FREE stadiums to play in, yet our voluntarily run and organised set up are made to scrape around to survive.

I remember Derby County playing on mud heaps every other week in the 70s and remember the time when their groundsman had to come onto the pitch and paint a new penalty spot.

 

If 3G pitch development improves, then it's worth looking into. Works ok for Saracens. However, if we could improve our pitch, then even better.

 

Can't really believe that all clubs should be given a grant as I don't know where the money would come from. Someone give us a massive donation, then that's different.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am not sure what Voice of Reason is referring to when he talks of a "temporary measure until the preferred situation can resume". The pitches I have mentioned in the Premier League are hybrids by design and are a permanent feature. Modern stadiums often are not suitable in micro climate terms for grass to grow well. So the Desso solution, as I understand it, reinforces grass with millions of artificial fibres. The system is also used on the Sao Paolo stadium pitch in Brazil ready for the World Cup.

I think that the very wet weather has highlighted the problems clubs face maintaining all grass pitches in good condition. But those clubs playing on 3G pitches were not persuaded by the weather in recent months, they chose to do so for largely economic reasons, I suppose. The pitches are available almost 24/7 so all the club's teams can play on the one high quality pitch saving the club the cost of hiring alternatives and clubs can also hire out their pitch for other uses. All clubs have to consider the economic choices facing them, they may choose to invest more on players at the expense of improving the drainage, for example, of their pitch or they may decide that a FIFA recommended 3G pitch is a better investment in the longer term. There is a real cost attaching to postponed matches, especially derbies over the Christmas and New Year period. I see that Maidstone's gate on Boxing Day was 2000, had that game been postponed to an evening fixture later in the season the gate may have been below 1500, a loss of over £5000 in gate receipts alone, then there are the cash flow issues of paying staff when there is no income due to postponed games.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

But clubs survival IS all about money.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Surely it's cheaper for clubs to invest in covers for the pitches???

Ok it wouldn't get the games on under a hard frost but that's not usually the issue,it's more snow and in particular rain which has led to postponements this season.

While not cheap,surely if every club had covers then the costs of these would reduced quite dramatically if mass purchased

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Funnily enough they have been having the same discussion in Speedway about covering the track, nothing gets done there either!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...