Under 18s ???

[borgy]

I don't understand? On our front page it indicates that our under 18s were unlucky to be beat by W Abbey yesterday, when in fact the game took place last week??? And the reality of it all was that we got beat by a very poor W Abbey side that played with only 8 players for most of the first half and then 10 there after!  

As a players dad, all I'm saying is please report the facts, if its possible??. sorry!. but It must be said.

[Blues-u18's]

You want facts?? Ok. Fact 1 - The report didn't say the match was "yesterday". Fact 2 -The report didn't say anyone was unlucky. Fact 3 - W Abbey had 8 players for 13 minutes, not "most of the first half". Fact 4 - W Abbey were awarded a disputed penalty. Fact 5 - BTFC had 2 blatant penalties not given.

W Abbey were poor, agreed. We played poor and missed chances, so whats your point?? Other than the amount of players on the pitch at a given time, what wasn't mentioned? I really don't understand the point your trying to make. Do you want young players publicly slated for having a bad match or missing chances? Are you saying the reports biased and W Abbey deserved victory? Was BTFC outplayed? I think if you watched the same match I did you'd of seen a team dominate (as expected against 8/10 players) and miss lots of chances and concede 3 basic goals to the 3 attacks that the home side had. The report does not say anyone played poor/well or deserved to win. If seeing players slagged off on a web site is what you wanted, Im sorry but you wont see it here.