The Mayor Of Simpleton Posted April 10, 2013 Share Posted April 10, 2013 http://www.activistpost.com/2013/04/uk-man-wins-court-victory-over-bbc-for.html Interesting... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Big J R Posted April 11, 2013 Share Posted April 11, 2013 Indeed !! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Loose Posted April 11, 2013 Share Posted April 11, 2013 So a conditional discharge and paying £200 court costs is a victory? An "empiric" victory then. Principles still cost money even if the licence doesn't! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Eastside Urchin Posted April 11, 2013 Share Posted April 11, 2013 Doh!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Basil-Don Posted April 12, 2013 Share Posted April 12, 2013 is every conspiracy theorist absolutely fcking mental ?? - certainly seems that way to me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
missunderstood Posted April 12, 2013 Share Posted April 12, 2013 Despite Its many faults the BBC is still the best channel on my TV, and I consider my licence fee great value for money. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Mayor Of Simpleton Posted April 12, 2013 Author Share Posted April 12, 2013 is every conspiracy theorist absolutely fcking mental ?? - certainly seems that way to me. There are a few nut jobs, admittedly, but there are also a lot of people who see things differently as well. I am interested in conspiracy theories, and believe that some do have an element of truth about them (9/11 for example - I don't think that the BBC, CNN etc. were totally upfront with people. Tower 7 being a real oops moment for them). There are also a lot of divisive 'shills' in conspiracy theories like Alex Jones (not the One Show presenter, by the way) and some people in conspiracy theories are now asking if David Icke is in fact an Illuminati insider. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Basil-Don Posted April 12, 2013 Share Posted April 12, 2013 There are a few nut jobs, admittedly, but there are also a lot of people who see things differently as well. I am interested in conspiracy theories, and believe that some do have an element of truth about them (9/11 for example - I don't think that the BBC, CNN etc. were totally upfront with people. Tower 7 being a real oops moment for them). There are also a lot of divisive 'shills' in conspiracy theories like Alex Jones (not the One Show presenter, by the way) and some people in conspiracy theories are now asking if David Icke is in fact an Illuminati insider. i'll explain to you how it works- do politicans lie? yes all the time, do the rich look after themselves? yes again do the people in power want to keep power? yes they do is the country run by a paedophille mafia? no thats fcking stupid do jews drink the blood of young gentiles? no again thats fcking stupid do you see how all this works, not being rude but youre posting some links to some very disturbing websites. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Mayor Of Simpleton Posted April 12, 2013 Author Share Posted April 12, 2013 Err...Basil... First off, calm down. Second - links to which sites that are disturbing? I've not posted any on this thread that I am aware of (apart from the one in my initial post here). Third, yes I know about politicians and the people who pull their strings (Rothschild and co). I have never said that the Illuminati is a fact, but it is certainly an interesting area of study. There is definitely more, in my opinion, to society and social control than meets the eye. If anybody is interested in the Illuminati and the Pyramid of Power, then this link (2nd image down) will explain more about it http://socioecohisto...com/2012/11/16/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Loose Posted April 12, 2013 Share Posted April 12, 2013 I've got nothing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hookey Posted April 12, 2013 Share Posted April 12, 2013 I've got nothing. LOL. All that aside, how on earth were they able to say a building has collapsed 20 minutes before it had? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Mayor Of Simpleton Posted April 12, 2013 Author Share Posted April 12, 2013 All that aside, how on earth were they able to say a building has collapsed 20 minutes before it had? A very interesting question. Prison Planet commented about this some years ago: 'The fact that the BBC reported on the collapse of Building 7 over twenty minutes in advance of its implosion obviously provokes a myriad of questions as to how they knew it was about to come down when the official story says its collapse happened accidentally as a result of fire damage and debris weakening the building's structure. As we have documented before, firefighters, police and first responders were all told to get back from the building because it was about to be brought down. It is widely acknowledged by those who were there on the scene that warnings were issued for people to evacuate the area in anticipation of the building's collapse, with some even stating that a 20 second countdown preceded the collapse of the 47-story skyscraper, again clearly suggesting that it was taken down by means of explosives as the video footage of its implosion illustrates. Alex Jones' film Terror Storm documents how Thermate was the likely culprit for the implosion of the twin towers and also explores the collapse of WTC 7. In a September 2002 PBS documentary, the owner of the WTC complex Larry Silverstein discusses Building 7 and states that in the late afternoon of September 11, the decision was made to "pull it." The term "pull it" is industry jargon for controlled demolition, but Silverstein denied charges that WTC 7 had been deliberately brought down. This newly uncovered video confirms that the collapse of WTC 7 was no surprise, because television news stations were reporting on it before it happened! This footage is absolutely amazing and should provoke a firestorm of new questions aimed both at Silverstein and the BBC. Who told the BBC that the building was going to collapse before it did and why were they reporting its fall in advance of the event actually taking place? Many have speculated that some kind of press release was leaked too soon and AP wires, radio stations and TV news outlets prematurely reported on WTC 7's collapse. The video also severely undermines the credibility of the BBC who recently caused controversy by airing a 9/11 hit piece that sought to debunk questions that bring the official story into doubt.' Now, don't take that (or anything the corporate agendaist media tells you) as absolute fact. Draw your own conclusions from it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Basil-Don Posted April 12, 2013 Share Posted April 12, 2013 right i see so Rothchilds the bankers,hold up they sound a bit jewish !!,so the zionists have all the money and they feast on young gentiles supplied to them by the padeophile mafia. yes interesting. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
missunderstood Posted April 12, 2013 Share Posted April 12, 2013 right i see so Rothchilds the bankers,hold up they sound a bit jewish !!,so the zionists have all the money and they feast on young gentiles supplied to them by the padeophile mafia. yes interesting. Try taking a bit more water with whatever your drink. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Mayor Of Simpleton Posted April 12, 2013 Author Share Posted April 12, 2013 Basil is right about the Jewish/Zionism connection, but that is about it. Not all of the Rothschild family are bad eggs, and many of them in fact do a lot of good and donate greatly to charity. However, they are a powerful elite family (they even admit that themselves) and have a lot of influence over national governments. Therefore, certain people view them with a great deal of suspicion. The Rockefeller dynasty is viewed the same way in some quarters as well. There are paedophiles in high ranking societies and institutions, and one train of thought recently was that Sir Jimmy Savile was a procurer of children for an elite gang of paedophiles. Whether he was or not, we will never find out for certain. As I already said, not every conspiracy theory is factual (and a lot of them are double bluffs made by shills) but don't expect everything you see and hear on BBC/ITV/Sky/Channel 4/Channel 5 etc. or read in the tabloids and broadsheets to be the absolute truth - 9/10 times it isn't. One of the best, and indeed more factual, 'conspiracist sites' is the UK Column website which is run by Brian Gerrish: http://www.ukcolumn.org/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Mayor Of Simpleton Posted April 12, 2013 Author Share Posted April 12, 2013 Straight out of left-field: Is HM Queen Elizabeth II about to resign? 'WATCH ON YOU TUBE: The International Tribunal into Crimes of Church and State (ITCCS) ITCCS Breaking News Update - Thursday, April 11, 2013 (9 am GMT) Pope Francis is linked to Exocet Missile Acquisition, according to British government source - Margaret Thatcher's Death and Queen's Pending Resignation are Connected Brussels and London: Whatever it is that dwells in Rome behind the mask of religion and empire is inexorably being revealed. And its mask slipped further yesterday with more startling revelations involving the new Pope Francis, Jorge Bergoglio. A reliable source in the British civil service who has provided accurate internal leaks in the past to our Tribunal has revealed the following to an ITCCS officer in London: Commencing in September of 1981, the present Pope Francis 1 acted as an agent for the Argentine military Junta to acquire Exocet missiles which were used against the Royal Navy flotilla during the Falklands War the following year. During September and October of 1981, Pope Francis, as then-priest Jorge Mario Bergoglio, applied through his friend Roberto Calvi, a high official in the Vatican Bank, for the funds that allowed the Argentine Junta to buy "at least twenty" of the Exocet missiles at a cost of over $200 million, according to the British source. The same source stated to an ITCCS officer in London on April 9, 2013, "The Junta knew the British would oppose their seizure of the Malvinas so they got their man Father Bergoglio to get them the missiles, since he was friends with Roberto Calvi. Margaret Thatcher was the Prime Minister in 1982, and both she and Buckingham Palace knew that it was Bergoglio who had lined up the missile funding for (General) Videla. Thatcher in fact approved an MI-6 plan to eliminate the priest, Father Bergoglio, but that fizzled out. But now that same priest has become the Pope, and Thatcher just suddenly died, and the Queen is stepping down under rumored assassination fears, after she had already cancelled her March 6 trip to Rome when it became clear that Bergoglio would become Pope. These are not coincidences." After the Exocet missile deal was successfully concluded, the relatively unknown cleric, Fr. Jorge Bergoglio, was rapidly elevated in the Argentine Catholic hierarchy. He became the head of the entire Roman Catholic Church in Argentina in 1998 as part of his reward. On June 17, 1982 - just two months after the start of the Falklands War - Bergoglio's Vatican bank associate Roberto Calvi was found dead, hanging under Blackfriar's Bridge in London. http://www.onlinepublishingcompany.info/content/sitenewsreadmore/infobox/news/template/default/active_id/746 http://www.nytimes.com/1982/07/28/world/italy-s-mysterious-deepening-bank-scandal.html?pagewanted=all Two books have confirmed the Vatican Bank and Roberto Calvi's link to the Argentine Exocet deal: In God's Name by David Yallop, and The Entity: Five Centuries of Secret Vatican Espionage by Eric Frattini. Is the Jesuit Pope Francis linked to the deaths of Roberto Calvi and former Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher, and to an assassination plan against Queen Elizabeth? This evidence and recent events certainly suggest so. On April 10, 2013, an official inquiry about these facts and questions was sent by our Tribunal to the Papal Office and to the Vatican Secretary of State. Our inquiry has gone unanswered. Internatonal Tribunal into Crimes of Church and State www.itccs.org' Might put a fiver on this... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.