BlueGate Alan Posted March 27, 2013 Share Posted March 27, 2013 Poll to close Thursday PM. Beaten by a more clinical side last night for sure, though I thought when we equalised we may have gone on to win it, but not to be. My first loss I have seen at Hartsdown too in the League, as not there when we lost to Concord & Cray. Anyways am sure the lads can be back on track againsdt Thurrock on Friday. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
upthegate Posted March 27, 2013 Share Posted March 27, 2013 Looks like somebody has voted who wasn't at the game as they've voted for Ibe. Or maybe just a wind up .... ! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cookie Posted March 27, 2013 Share Posted March 27, 2013 Oh he was there,as always and though I don't agree with it it is his opinion & he is entitled to his vote! Two players I thought that wern't up to scratch last night were Ibe (despite the goal) and Murphy. Both need to up their games i.m.o. Rook merits consideration for a starting spot next home game,though I would hope to have my first view of Purcell first and foremost. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
upthegate Posted March 27, 2013 Share Posted March 27, 2013 Yes I suppose everyone is entitled to an opinion. Bodkin for me was MOM, he kept trying and played a few excellent cross field balls, at least one of which should have been buried if TM had his shooting boots on. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gerald Threegoals Posted March 27, 2013 Share Posted March 27, 2013 Oh he was there,as always and though I don't agree with it it is his opinion & he is entitled to his vote! Two players I thought that wern't up to scratch last night were Ibe (despite the goal) and Murphy. Both need to up their games i.m.o. Rook merits consideration for a starting spot next home game,though I would hope to have my first view of Purcell first and foremost. Everyone is entitled to their opinion - indeed! Murphy worked his socks off last night and, although things didn't go for him, never let his head drop. To consider repacing him with Rook, who will not give you a tenth of the effort, and has not shown any quality to commend him in any of the games that I have seen, would be a really retrograde step. That's my opinion! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
upthegate Posted March 27, 2013 Share Posted March 27, 2013 I don't think the suggestion was Rook for Murphy but Rook for Ibe. Rooky certainly looks like he wants to be on the pitch more than Ibe. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
michael Posted March 27, 2013 Share Posted March 27, 2013 Is it a bit of a dilemma when your player coach may not merit a place in the starting line-up ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cookie Posted March 27, 2013 Share Posted March 27, 2013 I don't think the suggestion was Rook for Murphy but Rook for Ibe. Rooky certainly looks like he wants to be on the pitch more than Ibe. Thank you. Indeed Rook for Ibe, correct. As for Murphy & despite not letting his head drop (can't argue with that) he certainly didn't show his true form last night. Not an opinion..fact! He can do and has done much better than that. A remark which also applies to Ibe I'm sure. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gerald Threegoals Posted March 27, 2013 Share Posted March 27, 2013 Thank you. Indeed Rook for Ibe, correct. As for Murphy & despite not letting his head drop (can't argue with that) he certainly didn't show his true form last night. Not an opinion..fact! He can do and has done much better than that. A remark which also applies to Ibe I'm sure. I think Ibe is deceptive, looking a bit laid back and occasionally getting caught on the ball, but he does hold it up effectively and got on the scoresheet last night. And players are allowed the occasional bad game at this level. But I haven't seen Rook have a good game, much as it pains me to say it. I am quite surprised that others, who are entitled to their opinion of course, feel that he is likely to be an improvement. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dannyriding Posted March 27, 2013 Share Posted March 27, 2013 Looks like somebody has voted who wasn't at the game as they've voted for Ibe. Or maybe just a wind up .... ! Not a wind up - My Opinion - sorry Sir Alf I bow to your superior opinion.......................... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Porka Posted March 27, 2013 Share Posted March 27, 2013 Think and agree with those above that say Ibe is deceptive. Effective as a hold up player and a good poacher. His goals to games ratio is good, purely because he does all his work in the right areas. Whilst he doesn't have much pace, he provided a key outlet in the first half especially, when we were rattled after their equaliser. He's a better hold up man than Rook at the moment. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vic pain lives! Posted March 27, 2013 Share Posted March 27, 2013 Can't believe anyone has voted smurf ! I like him but poor last night and got so little change out of their right back that we swopped our wide players over, effectively reducing bodkins effect on the game. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BlueGate Alan Posted March 28, 2013 Author Share Posted March 28, 2013 A clear win for Matt with the ever improving, Tommy W, Ryan and, IMO, the impressive Jamie in joint second. Poll now closed Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.