Surrey Premier Cup

[4-5-1]

I heard Walton played an ineligible player too the same as Staines.

[NLSoccerette]

I heard Walton played an ineligible player too the same as Staines.

 

Oh ok that sure will wipe the smug smile off the managers face lol...I'm interested now where did you hear that?? Dm me if u prefer!

[nut250]

Where did you hear that 451

[nut250]

I'll be there to watch Staines or Westfield smack up Walton and wipe that smug smile of their managers face!!!

And thanks for the nice comments soccerette

[4-5-1]

Isn't that what a poster said what happened in their game too? Or was that incorrect?

[bomaya]

Oh ok that sure will wipe the smug smile off the managers face lol...I'm interested now where did you hear that?? Dm me if u prefer!

 

Which manager are you referring to?

[The Phoenix]

I've heard today that although Staines Lammas beat Westfield in the semi final this week it will actually be Westfield who progress to the final by default curtesy of Lammas playing an ineligible player! Does anyone know anything about this?? Apparently the player concerned was only brought on for the last few minutes, oh dear!!

 

Funnily enough there is also an allegation of an ineligible player being involved in the other semi final match (Mole Valley v Walton Casuals Res). Again, anyone know the details?

 

Would be a tad ironic if we end up with a Westfield v Mole Valley final.

 

Hey Chubby, seems to be lots of speculation surrounding the eventual finalists in the Premier Surrey Cup albeit Westfield seem to now be confirmed at Staines expense. What is the allegation from the MVSCR & Walton Casuals match?

[SCR FC Secretary]

Phoenix

 

As a member of The MVSCR committee, we would quite like to know what these allegations are, as we haven't made any or logged any kind of appeal.

[The Phoenix]

Hmm interesting Legend thank you, but either someone is playing mind games (for what gain I'm not certain if its fabricated) or someone genuinely knows something, I thought though according to rules I saw, protests had to be lodged within 2 days of the match and backed with £100 fee so surely it's too late in any case?.

[SCR FC Secretary]

That's quite possible Phoenix. Like I said, we felt hard done by on the actual day of the fixture as we were within 20 secs of going through and no complaint has been logged.

 

 

[VPCTFC]

Hmm interesting Legend thank you, but either someone is playing mind games (for what gain I'm not certain if its fabricated) or someone genuinely knows something, I thought though according to rules I saw, protests had to be lodged within 2 days of the match and backed with £100 fee so surely it's too late in any case?.

 

I'm sure Surrey FA check eligibility automatically so there's not neccessarily a need for anyone to protest. Chessington & Hook Reserves were removed from the competition in the third round and, as mentioned elsewhere, a few years ago, two teams were chucked out after playing their semi-final in the Senior Cup. Both teams had played each other so I doubt it was a case of either of them lodging a protest.

[Mewcenary]

I'm sure Surrey FA check eligibility automatically so there's not neccessarily a need for anyone to protest. Chessington & Hook Reserves were removed from the competition in the third round and, as mentioned elsewhere, a few years ago, two teams were chucked out after playing their semi-final in the Senior Cup. Both teams had played each other so I doubt it was a case of either of them lodging a protest.

 

Ah, didn't know that about C&H and the 3rd round. I refereed that fixture. Feels weird for it to (ultimately) not count for anything!

[Chubby Brown]

Can confirm that Mole Valley have made an appeal to Surrey FA, so not sure why those connected with the club are denying it?

 

Final will be Westfiled v Mole Valley.

[4-5-1]

I'm quite interested Chubby how you knew all this before anyone at Lammas did? Fancy sharing?

[Chubby Brown]

Couldn't possibly!!

[SCRFC Gaffer]

Chubby we have NOT to date appealed to county and why would we deny it if we believe we have grounds?

Does seeking clarity on a few points from

Those who'll know constitute in your opinion lodging an official protest, cos we believe there is a huge difference.

 

If we were reinstated we'd be singing from the mountain tops not hiding it & you can 100% believe that.

[Chubby Brown]

Look forward to hearing your song in due course then MV Gaffa!!! Have the questions posed to Surrey FA got anything to do with a ceryain players' eligibility?? That's a YES then....hence you believe there are grounds for an appeal.

[The Mayor Of Simpleton]

Come on Chubby - you're not usually backwards at coming forwards...

 

Spill the beans, we're all ears....

[4-5-1]

NLN have you heard anything in regards of the final for Westfield?

[Mewcenary]

The Surrey FA website currently has the Final showing as follows:

 

Walton Casuals F.C. (Reserves) VS Westfield F.C. (First)

 

http://www.surreyfa..../fixtures#final

 

And for the pertinent semi-final:

 

Westfield F.C. (First) CCD-HW Staines Lammas F.C. (First)

[+] Cup Committee Decisions - Home Win

Edited March 5, 2013 by Mewcenary