Munchkin Posted October 18, 2012 Share Posted October 18, 2012 Interesting thing happened in our game on Saturday. Player was fouled a couple of yards outside the area, but still stayed on his feet with the ball. The referee allowed play to continue, the player was the fouled again by a different player, this time inside the area. The referee awarded a free kick for the original offence. Obviously this happened over a matter of seconds and I appreciate the referee had to make a decision in that time and can understand why he brought it back. Just wondering what the thoughts are if this was the correct decision or after allowing play to continue does the 2nd offence become active? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Winslow Boy Posted October 18, 2012 Share Posted October 18, 2012 I would have been incensed not to get penalty as he played advantage I'd used it well and then was fouled again. Has to be a penalty. Tw benefit should be with the player/team who have been impeeded and it clearly wasn't in this case. Must be hard for a ref in real time though Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Karen Browne Posted October 18, 2012 Share Posted October 18, 2012 We need our resident referee PTG to enlighten us with the correct ruling Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Munchkin Posted October 18, 2012 Author Share Posted October 18, 2012 Forgot to add obviously I thought we should have got a penalty. Didn't have a chance to ask the referee after as I was fishing the ball and net out of the river Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HKP Posted October 18, 2012 Share Posted October 18, 2012 I would think the first offence is the one the referee has to take action on.. Interesting to see a referees point. if correct, chop a player down in the box after youe teammate has already had one attempt! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
the quite one Posted October 18, 2012 Share Posted October 18, 2012 If the referee has played an advantage, and a second offense has been committed then the second offense does become active and a penalty should be awarded. Only thing I can say that goes with the referee is that he felt that the second offense wasn't a penalty and therefore the first offense is active......Does that make sense? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Winslow Boy Posted October 18, 2012 Share Posted October 18, 2012 If the referee has played an advantage, and a second offense has been committed then the second offense does become active and a penalty should be awarded. Only thing I can say that goes with the referee is that he felt that the second offense wasn't a penalty and therefore the first offense is active......Does that make sense? Agreed as soon as advantage is taken the next foul has to be active. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
you aint got a castle Posted October 18, 2012 Share Posted October 18, 2012 Its all down to the referees interpretation of the rules and the way they are applied in the match, I bet another referee would have given a penalty. It must be a tough job as in many games things happen really quickly and decisions have to be made in seconds, with players of both sides in your ear it cant be easy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
the quite one Posted October 18, 2012 Share Posted October 18, 2012 I agree it is a tough job, but its mainly down to common sense, the advantage has to be given and the advantage is the penalty Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
petethegreek Posted October 18, 2012 Share Posted October 18, 2012 If the Referee has acknowledged both incidents as fouls then the advantage from the first incident has been played. Once the second foul has occurred then this is the one that should be penalized thus awarding of a penalty kick would be the correct decision. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
the quite one Posted October 18, 2012 Share Posted October 18, 2012 I Knew I was right Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Karen Browne Posted October 18, 2012 Share Posted October 18, 2012 I Knew I was right Give that man a whistle and some red and yellow cards Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doug Posted October 18, 2012 Share Posted October 18, 2012 If the Referee has acknowledged both incidents as fouls then the advantage from the first incident has been played. Once the second foul has occurred then this is the one that should be penalized thus awarding of a penalty kick would be the correct decision. I agree with that but explain this one to me. Player clean through with Goalie to beat, gets taken out inside the box, ball runs loose to supporting player who is now 10 yards out , middle of goal no player anywhere near him, because he is crap manages to slice the ball wide . Ref having played advantage sees he has missed open goal so calls play back, gives a penalty and sends our keeper off !!!!!!!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
COYS Posted October 18, 2012 Share Posted October 18, 2012 If he was wrong it would be really embarrassing as he is a step 5 referee Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
the quite one Posted October 18, 2012 Share Posted October 18, 2012 If its a sending off offence then the player has to go and no advantage should be played...No one keeps me quiet... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
petethegreek Posted October 18, 2012 Share Posted October 18, 2012 I agree with that but explain this one to me. Player clean through with Goalie to beat, gets taken out inside the box, ball runs loose to supporting player who is now 10 yards out , middle of goal no player anywhere near him, because he is crap manages to slice the ball wide . Ref having played advantage sees he has missed open goal so calls play back, gives a penalty and sends our keeper off !!!!!!!!! Can't pull it back in this example. No penalty and no send off for denying an obvious goalscoring opportunity. Was it one of your players who missed, Doug? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
petethegreek Posted October 18, 2012 Share Posted October 18, 2012 I've gone from explaining the finer points of the off-side Law to JT to this. It's like Ask the Ref. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
the quite one Posted October 19, 2012 Share Posted October 19, 2012 Give that man a whistle and some red and yellow cards Im a qualified referee, up to level 5 just can't be asked to do it anymore Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
the quite one Posted October 19, 2012 Share Posted October 19, 2012 Can't pull it back in this example. No penalty and no send off for denying an obvious goalscoring opportunity. Was it one of your players who missed, Doug? Agreed if the advantage had been played then the offender hasn't denied a clear goal scoring opportunity. although as previously stated if it is a sending off offence no advantage should be played and player dismissed from field of play. Anyway, till further incidents on Saturday Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rhodes Posted October 19, 2012 Share Posted October 19, 2012 I've gone from explaining the finer points of the off-side Law Do you know the off-side Law then Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.