Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support Fans Focus by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content

Sat 17th Dec Results/ Latest

Hartley Hare

By Hartley Hare
in Combined Counties Forum

 Share

Recommended Posts

BlueAndWhiteArmy Newbie

BlueAndWhiteArmy

Posted
Posted

South Kilburn 2 Sheerwater 1

 

Game of many chances, South Kilburn coming out on top. All a bit baffled how we lost the game and their goals came form two errors, which makes it even harder to bare.

 

Pitch was shocking in my opinion and surprised it went ahead, players were like Bambi f

Result has gone through to the fa as 17-2. South kilburn were in the bar at wembley after our game today what a bunch of w*****s they are.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
CW1975 Newbie

CW1975

Posted
Posted

Saw on Twitter South Kilburn 17 Sheerwater 2!? Surely not??

 

Just saw this as well ! Must be a mistake I reckon it should be 7-2

 

Why not go for 17-2 GD

 

Thats what I'm asking was it really 17-2 ?

 

No, and it wasn't 7-2 as you assumed!!! ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites
duncs Newbie

duncs

Posted
Posted

Right you lot who are all reading this Topic as far as i'm concerned none of you can have any excuses not to give us just 1 hour of your time for a good cause tomorrow afternoon,come on guys lets get to Bedfont in numbers then if you have to go somewhere else then we can sort it out,don't forget we have won this trophy for the last 2 seasons so it would be a shame not to have enough players I myself am giving up my middle grandsons party to be at the game imagine the sh1t I have taken but it will be worth it if we win.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Guernsey Geordie Newbie

Guernsey Geordie

Posted
Posted

Isn't this at least the 3rd time SK's score has been hugely exaggerated ? As well as being a bunch of dirty tw+ts they also have some dick sending results like that on a regular basis. Can't wait to see Guernsey stick aqt least 6 past them over here.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
bomaya Newbie

bomaya

Posted
Posted
Isn't this at least the 3rd time SK's score has been hugely exaggerated ? As well as being a bunch of dirty tw+ts they also have some dick sending results like that on a regular basis. Can't wait to see Guernsey stick aqt least 6 past them over here.

 

It's the secretarys job to text the results in. Maybe they just can't use their phone or have fat fingers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Rother Newbie

Rother

Posted
Posted

Windsor rather ominously won 10-0 today.

 

:D Michael Chennells scored 5 on his home debut.

 

Windsor were pretty awesome but Raynes Park were very very poor and at times their 'keeper looked like he may not actually have played in the position before.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
TRS Newbie

TRS

Posted
Posted

Frimley Green 3 Worcester Park 3 Another good game at the Green 2 well matched sides and a very good game for the neutrals maybe Frimley should have taken all 3 points but let in 2 howlers but all in all a draw was a fair result

 

Agree duncs, not a bad game and a hat trick for Dan Simmonds. Another one probably playing below his level. Worcester Park bench and players were going mad after his 3rd claiming offside, but I was almost in line and it looked a great decision by the lino on the far side to me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
TRS Newbie

TRS

Posted
Posted

 

:D Michael Chennells scored 5 on his home debut.

 

Windsor were pretty awesome but Raynes Park were very very poor and at times their 'keeper looked like he may not actually have played in the position before.

 

Chennells?? Wasn't he at AFC Totton (Top end of Southern Prem)? So why would he drop 2 levels?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Rother Newbie

Rother

Posted
Posted (edited)

Article in this week's Windsor Express might help answer those questions...

 

Windsor FC’s founding director Kevin Stott insists the club is not living beyond its means following the recent captures of the likes of Jake Parsons, Andrew Fagan and Michael Chennells.

The trio of players were all key parts of the Windsor & Eton side when the club went bust in 2010, with debts running into hundreds of thousands of pounds.

News of their return has raised eyebrows among the local football community, especially as Windsor beat the likes of Slough Town and Chesham United to the signing of Chennells last week.

But Stott insists the budget he set at the start of the season has not been raised and that the players have not returned to Stag Meadow for financial reasons.

He said: “Inevitably I can see why people are talking but I can guarantee we are not paying any of them what they were being paid last time (at Windsor & Eton).

“They have come back because they want to be part of what we are trying to achieve here, it’s not because we are throwing money around.

“I set a budget at the start of the season and I haven’t raised that budget. Keith Scott is working within it and the players who have come in are prepared to work within it as well.

“It’s the vision of the club and the ambitions we have for it that they are buying into.”

When Windsor FC was formed in the summer, Stott always said he wanted to stay away from a business model which saw one benefactor putting money in to ensure the club stayed afloat.

Self-sustainability has always been the long-term goal and the club has plans to install 3G astroturf pitches and a gym at Stag Meadow in the near future.

And Stott insists that is still very much the case. He said: “I always said I would fund the start up costs and that’s what I’m going to do.

“But I don’t have any grand designs to be the sugar daddy of a football club, that doesn’t work.

“So if we’re not given the go ahead to develop the ground and do what we want to do, I’m not going to be doing it again next season or the season after next.

“That doesn’t mean we won’t have a football club next year, we just won’t have a budget that we could sustain in a higher division.”

Windsor’s founding director added: “But I would be gutted now if we don’t manage to pull off what we’re trying to do, I think it’s a model for non-league football.

“We’re trying to do something different, not repeat the same mistakes. We’re on the road to self-sustainability.

“I don’t want to be just another football club who had a dream, drew some pretty pictures but then saw nothing happen.

“We want to take the club forward and we’re all working very hard to make sure we do it in the right way.”

Edited by Rother
Link to comment
Share on other sites
VPCTFC Newbie

VPCTFC

Posted
Posted

"Self-sustainability has always been the long-term goal"

 

"We’re on the road to self-sustainability."

 

On the road? Long term goal? The club's only 6 months old. Surely it should have started being self-sustainable from day one?

This is the sort of nonsense Farnborough have been saying for four years.

They haven't spent above their budget either but their budget was a six figure sum too high in the first place.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...