how it works out?

[coach et 64]

In some Leagues when you play a suspended player,you lose the game and the result is chalked away on a 0-0 basis.How it comes Stansted result still stands in the results grid?

[smallsy]

Does it really matter? Shouldn't you be concentrating on winning best programme? Or secretary of the year?

[coach et 64]

Does it really matter? Shouldn't you be concentrating on winning best programme? Or secretary of the year?

 

 

Didn't enter it.To be honest don't really matter now.

[Grounhopper Mark.]

In some Leagues when you play a suspended player,you lose the game and the result is chalked away on a 0-0 basis.How it comes Stansted result still stands in the results grid?

 

 

I assume for goal diffs purposes, if it was the premier letague and Southend Manor were fighting with Bethanal Green for the final 4th European place, Southend Manor could argue their goal difference should be 2 goals better.

 

As 4th / 5th doesn't matter in esl, i assume Manor wont make a fuss about it, but if it was higher up the pyramid where it could affect promotion ./ play offs or Europe, i guess the result would have to stand to avoid messing up the goal diffs.

[coach et 64]

In some Leagues when you play a suspended player,you lose the game and the result is chalked away on a 0-0 basis.How it comes Stansted result still stands in the results grid?

 

 

I assume for goal diffs purposes, if it was the premier letague and Southend Manor were fighting with Bethanal Green for the final 4th European place, Southend Manor could argue their goal difference should be 2 goals better.

 

As 4th / 5th doesn't matter in esl, i assume Manor wont make a fuss about it, but if it was higher up the pyramid where it could affect promotion ./ play offs or Europe, i guess the result would have to stand to avoid messing up the goal diffs.

 

 

It isn't Manor,it was the Hullbridge game.No relevant to be honest there is no chance now that Stansted and Enfield finish level .

[Grounhopper Mark.]

In some Leagues when you play a suspended player,you lose the game and the result is chalked away on a 0-0 basis.How it comes Stansted result still stands in the results grid?

 

 

I assume for goal diffs purposes, if it was the premier letague and Southend Manor were fighting with Bethanal Green for the final 4th European place, Southend Manor could argue their goal difference should be 2 goals better.

 

As 4th / 5th doesn't matter in esl, i assume Manor wont make a fuss about it, but if it was higher up the pyramid where it could affect promotion ./ play offs or Europe, i guess the result would have to stand to avoid messing up the goal diffs.

 

 

 

 

It isn't Manor,it was the Hullbridge game.No relevant to be honest there is no chance now that Stansted and Enfield finish level .

 

Got the info that it was Southend Manor from the mitoo table. If it is wrong i am sure they will update later.

[coach et 64]

In some Leagues when you play a suspended player,you lose the game and the result is chalked away on a 0-0 basis.How it comes Stansted result still stands in the results grid?

 

 

I assume for goal diffs purposes, if it was the premier letague and Southend Manor were fighting with Bethanal Green for the final 4th European place, Southend Manor could argue their goal difference should be 2 goals better.

 

As 4th / 5th doesn't matter in esl, i assume Manor wont make a fuss about it, but if it was higher up the pyramid where it could affect promotion ./ play offs or Europe, i guess the result would have to stand to avoid messing up the goal diffs.

 

 

 

 

It isn't Manor,it was the Hullbridge game.No relevant to be honest there is no chance now that Stansted and Enfield finish level .

 

Got the info that it was Southend Manor from the mitoo table. If it is wrong i am sure they will update later.

 

 

never rely on Mitoo or the Echo.....kings of [****!!****] ups.Unfortunately that's what happen when someone that used to write about Epping forest mushrooms cultivation takes the place of a well informed Non League Legend reporter.

[Grounhopper Mark.]

In some Leagues when you play a suspended player,you lose the game and the result is chalked away on a 0-0 basis.How it comes Stansted result still stands in the results grid?

 

 

I assume for goal diffs purposes, if it was the premier letague and Southend Manor were fighting with Bethanal Green for the final 4th European place, Southend Manor could argue their goal difference should be 2 goals better.

 

As 4th / 5th doesn't matter in esl, i assume Manor wont make a fuss about it, but if it was higher up the pyramid where it could affect promotion ./ play offs or Europe, i guess the result would have to stand to avoid messing up the goal diffs.

 

 

 

 

It isn't Manor,it was the Hullbridge game.No relevant to be honest there is no chance now that Stansted and Enfield finish level .

 

Got the info that it was Southend Manor from the mitoo table. If it is wrong i am sure they will update later.

 

 

never rely on Mitoo or the Echo.....kings of [****!!****] ups.Unfortunately that's what happen when someone that used to write about Epping forest mushrooms cultivation takes the place of a well informed Non League Legend reporter.

 

 

Maybe it is an AFC Wimbledon situation, they were in the Ryman Prem at the time should of lost 18 points, they took it to the highest courts and got away with 3 points, but mitoo says.... Tuesday, 22 February 2011: [-3 points] Stansted 2 v 0 Southend Manor

 

I did hear a rumour that it was going to be 6 points then agreed at 3, so maybe the player in question played in both games, but lost the points for 1 game. Speculation and no offence to Compaq or NeverBeen as the season finished now anyway.

[coach et 64]

As far as I have been told it was the Hulbridge game.

[Grounhopper Mark.]

Coachie, just seen your game was the midweek before the Manor one.

 

W Hullbridge Sports 1 4 Stansted Thursday, 17 February 2011

Attendance 47

 

W Stansted

-3 points 2 0 Southend Manor Tuesday, 22 February 2011

Attendance 27

 

according to mitoo.

Edited April 18, 2011 by Grounhopper Mark.

[compaq7500]

people just to clarify the 3 points that stansted were deducted were from the 2-0 home win against southend manor and not the 4-1 away win at hullbridge sports,i hope that now clears up any doubt anyone might still have,also would like to point out that our club was only ever going to lose 3 points and not the 6 points as sugguested ( no offence ) by our dear friends at witham

Edited April 18, 2011 by compaq7500

[coach et 64]

Coachie, just seen your game was the midweek before the Manor one.

 

W Hullbridge Sports 1 4 Stansted Thursday, 17 February 2011

Attendance 47

 

W Stansted

-3 points 2 0 Southend Manor Tuesday, 22 February 2011

Attendance 27

 

according to mitoo.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Runwell, just a small correction to your report mate:

"To the match, and this was being billed as the title decider. Its significance had increased in the previous seven days. Firstly last saturday Stansted's unbeaten run surprisingly ended at home at the hands of Hullbridge Sports, just three games short of a season unbeaten campaign, and one short of the all time Essex Senior League record, set by Basildon Utd about thirty years ago. Then the real stake in the heart for the current champions was the docking of three points this week for fielding a player still awaiting punishment from the FA for an incident in a sunday league game, with the win over Southend Manor in february chalked off. That left Stansted four points behind Enfield with a game in hand, but with just two games left after this one. That meant a win for Enfield today would secure the championship, just leaving them to chew anxiously on whether they have the all clear to go up."

Correct reason for losing the 3 points is:

Stansted lose 3 points for playing substitute Joe Johnson against Hullbridge in 4 1 win when he was suspended

 

 

Thanks statto. I actually thought it was the Hullbridge game (which I was at on a yukky Thursday night, 17th February), but Mitoo said it was the Southend Manor game when I checked today to see if the tables had been updated. Mitoo is not my friend!

 

So Stansted get nil points from Hullbridge this season. They must hate you guys!

 

And someone called London Bucks should know better.......

[Grounhopper Mark.]

people just to clarify the 3 points that stansted were deducted were from the 2-0 home win against southend manor and not the 4-1 away win at hullbridge sports,i hope that now clears up any doubt anyone might still have.

 

Thanks, so you are saying Mitoo : Correct and Coachie : WRONG.

[coach et 64]

people just to clarify the 3 points that stansted were deducted were from the 2-0 home win against southend manor and not the 4-1 away win at hullbridge sports,i hope that now clears up any doubt anyone might still have.

 

Thanks, so you are saying Mitoo : Correct and Coachie : WRONG.

 

 

Well I was told after the Stansted away game by one of the Stansted officials unless something got lost in translation. And Statto rarely misses anything.....

[Football Man]

Just to confirm that the three points were deducted for the Southend Manor match. There is a further correction on the Kempster forum to the post copied by Coachie above.

[compaq7500]

people just to clarify the 3 points that stansted were deducted were from the 2-0 home win against southend manor and not the 4-1 away win at hullbridge sports,i hope that now clears up any doubt anyone might still have.

 

Thanks, so you are saying Mitoo : Correct and Coachie : WRONG.

 

 

Well I was told after the Stansted away game by one of the Stansted officials unless something got lost in translation. And Statto rarely misses anything.....

 

 

Statto sadly got this one wrong this time,but hey you cant get it right everytime

[coach et 64]

then Tell must have confused us with Southend Manor .... the first time I have heard it was from him and when you say "Against your lot do you remember the black player that came on towards the end?Personally I don't really care much but I can't find that team list.I'm quite good at keeping them in the office.