This Forum will be quiet!!!

[BUFC]

 

 

 

if Rhodes gets a new position

 

Luckily for him its not retrospective...............

 

 

Use of Social Networks:FA statement

 

A STATEMENT ON THE USE OF SOCIAL NETWORKING WEBSITES

 

(issued by the Football Association

 

The FA has issued clarification to participants relating to the use of social networking sites including, but not limited to, Twitter, Facebook and internet blogs.

 

Participants can be defined as anyone actively involved in football as a player, manager, coach, referee or working within the game as an administrator or official of a club, league or other body.

 

Participants should be aware that comments made on such sites may be considered public comment, and that further to FA Rule E3, any comments which are deemed improper, bring the game into disrepute, or are threatening, abusive, indecent or insulting may lead to disciplinary action.

 

Comments which are personal in nature or could be construed as offensive, use foul language or contain direct or indirect threats aimed at other participants are likely to be considered improper.

 

Participants are required to act in the best interests of the game at all times and should be aware of this when using social networking websites. Furthermore, participants are reminded that postings on social networking sites which they believe to be visible to a limited number of selected people may still end up in the public domain and consequently, care should be exercised with regards to the contents of such postings.

 

In addition, we would remind participants that social networking postings could also lead to civil proceedings being brought by affected parties.

 

 

 

Edited February 21, 2011 by BUFC

[Rhodes]

I've never read such nonsense in my life!

[Ground Hopper]

I've never read such nonsense in my life!

 

They do not mention forums

 

Just covering their backs anyway.

 

In truth it is probably aimed at people involved at a much higher level.

[BUFC]

I've never read such nonsense in my life!

 

They do not mention forums

 

.

 

it says 'including but not limited to......'

[BUFC]

I've never read such nonsense in my life!

 

You dont read your posts then?

[Rhodes]

They do not mention forums

Agreed, this Forum for example is just childs play at the end of the day however the likes of Keeps, Football Man, Sjj2112, Loosely, Love the Game and HTFCew take it, and themselves, far too seriously and there is no need to

[HTFCew]

They do not mention forums

Agreed, this Forum for example is just childs play at the end of the day however the likes of Keeps, Football Man, Sjj2112, Loosely, Love the Game and HTFCew take it, and themselves, far too seriously and there is no need to

 

Woo hoo! I made the list!

[Loose]

The list is growing.

[NeutralFan]

[petethegreek]

Rhodes - Were you not previously charged and found guilty for comments on this forum while a Club Official?

[nellie]

Pete sorry but no he wasnt charged or found guilty........the club was!!!!!

[Rhodes]

Rhodes - Were you not previously charged and found guilty for comments on this forum while a Club Official?

If so that's certainly the first I've heard of it.

[petethegreek]

Pete sorry but no he wasnt charged or found guilty........the club was!!!!!

 

So the Club was charged for comments made on this forum by Rhodes.

 

Thanks for clearing that up.

[Rhodes]

So the Club was charged for comments made on this forum by Rhodes.

Well, again, that's the first I have heard of it (*nose grows longer), why wasn't I approached by the Club at the time to answer any supposed wrong doing .... oh I remember now, it's because they had to sack me because I was a d*ck!

Edited February 23, 2011 by NeutralFan
Too tempting!

[BUFC]

So the Club was charged for comments made on this forum by Rhodes.

Well, again, that's the first I have heard of it (*nose grows longer), why wasn't I approached by the Club at the time to answer any supposed wrong doing .... oh I remember now, it's because they had to sack me because I was a d*ck!

 

:97:

[Rhodes]

oh I remember now, it's because they had to sack me because I was a d*ck!

NeutralFan - I didn't think a Moderator was allowed to add comments to members posts particularly if what is added is untrue, I have no option but to report you to Ian

[NeutralFan]

oh I remember now, it's because they had to sack me because I was a d*ck!

NeutralFan - I didn't think a Moderator was allowed to add comments to members posts particularly if what is added is untrue, I have no option but to report you to Ian

 

Really... must've missed the memo on that one, never mind!

 

I suppose if I'd put 'a reliable source told me' first it would make it ok?

 

 

 

[BUFC]

oh I remember now, it's because they had to sack me because I was a d*ck!

NeutralFan - I didn't think a Moderator was allowed to add comments to members posts particularly if what is added is untrue

 

its true though

[petethegreek]

oh I remember now, it's because they had to sack me because I was a d*ck!

NeutralFan - I didn't think a Moderator was allowed to add comments to members posts particularly if what is added is untrue, I have no option but to report you to Ian

 

 

or the FA.

 

[Hookey]

oh I remember now, it's because they had to sack me because I was a d*ck!

NeutralFan - I didn't think a Moderator was allowed to add comments to members posts particularly if what is added is untrue

 

its true though

 

And funny.