Amanda Knox - Guilty or Innocent

[Eastside Urchin]

Wouldn't bother it was sh1t yesterday

[officialspokesman]

Wouldn't bother it was sh1t yesterday

 

 

A bit like your football team then.

[Eastside Urchin]

I see yours had a resounding victory last night!!!!!

Remind me please which footballing powerhouse you lost to last night???

[Rhodes]

With Amanda's appeal fast approaching, check out this interesting article from Seattle's local paper 'The Daily Weekly' where her biggest critics, who previously thought she was guilty, have now totally changed their tune and are joining the campaign for her release:

 

http://blogs.seattleweekly.com/dailyweekly/2010/09/amanda_knox_innocent_-_lack_of.php

[Loose]

A rather interesting twist Rhodesly and another case in point where perhaps you should really check your facts out before committing yourself to a cause.

 

Ex-FBI "Agent" Steve Moore appears to have no record of law enforcement either with the Federal Bureau of Investigation or any State or local police departments within the USA. Oh dear.

 

Amanda Knox's case won't be helped by this sort of nutter will it?

[Rhodes]

Loosely - You would say that though wouldn't you, why can't you just be supportive of Amanda Knox and hope that her forthcoming appeal is successful so the poor girl can soon return to the bosom of her family in Seattle, resume a normal life and seek compensation for her wrongful conviction.

[Loose]

Rhodesly mate - poor Amanda's cause won't be served well by charletans, fantasists and village idiots will it? Sadly you just go on posting any old [****!!****] you come across without checking it out, you seem to think that any old headline supports your argument, well it doesn't. People aren't so naive anymore, you might have gotten away with it once upon a time but people are on to you now and won't believe any old cobblers you like to promote.

 

Poor Amanda, thats what I say with fools like you and "ex FBI agents" trying to get in on the act.

[Eastside Urchin]

I think that's classed as a bite

[Loose]

You sure? I think Rhodesly won't be able to resist a reply.

[Rhodes]

Loosely - You really never cease to amaze me, you seem to wait for me to make a post so you can respond and it appears to be the highlight of your day. At the end of the day Amanda Knox is innocent, she was 'an innocent abroad' in the true sense of the word and was framed by an archaic and 'crooked' Judicial system in a 'strange land' which will have serious future repercussions on Italy in the same way it did Portugal with the infamous Madeleine McCann case.

[Loose]

Now, thats a bite BB.

 

Poor old Rhodesly, ever the wounded soldier.

[Horace]

Loosely - You would say that though wouldn't you, why can't you just be supportive of Amanda Knox and hope that her forthcoming appeal is successful so the poor girl can soon return to the bosom of her family in Seattle, resume a normal life and seek compensation for her wrongful conviction.

 

Cliff - how do you know that she didn't do it? What is your basis for saying that she's innocent, beyond saying that she looks like she couldn't have done it?

Most countries are defensive of their own legal and administrative arrangements, and particularly so when it's the mighty USA (or indeed former World leaders like the UK) who's telling them that they are wrong. You are building yourself up for a fall again.

[Rhodes]

Horace - It's only Loosely who is putting a doubt in your mind and being his usual opposite self. It was exactly the same with the Akmal Shaikh case when, if you recall, Shaikh was guilty as charged of heroine traficking in China and rightly executed for his heinous crimes yet Loosely even argued the toss there and split hairs.

[Loose]

You are like a dog in the manger Rhodesly, anyone can join in your "discussion" so long as they agree with you - and yet your reasoning is childlike and your presentation of the "facts" is as ever just regurgitated Headlines that you pick off the internet without looking further.

 

Case in point that you wanted to claim that Amanda Knox's case had been bolstered by the opinion of an "ex FBI Agent" - when exposed as complete horrocks you want to take your ball home. It's quite sad really, if you can't behave like an adult then why play with the grown-ups?

[Rhodes]

when exposed as complete horrocks you want to take your ball home

Loosely - You are talking absolute nonsense. Meredith Kercher's family spoke of their relief that justice had finally been done for their daughter however even they know full well that Amanda Knox was not guilty of the heinous crime and have kept a dignified silence, furthermore even 'crooked' Chief Prosecutor Giuliano Mignini wavered over Amanda's motive during her trial in the Kangaroo Court, initially saying she had 'butchered' Meredith Kercher during a violent sex game that had spiralled out of control, and then later claiming it was hatred and envy for her flatmate that prompted her attack. Here in Britain, even the tabloid press such as the Sun and News of the World have been restrained with barely a mention of the case let alone their infamous ‘hang 'em high’ headlines they usually reserve for calculated killers of our own by 'foreigners'. Meredith Kercher sadly died a lingering and painful death, she was suffocated and her throat slit, forensic reports suggested that in her final moments she was stripped, pushed to her knees with her head crushed against the floor, sexually abused, strangled and then stabbed three times in the neck however Amanda Knox was no way responsible, not in a million years.

[Loose]

Well Rhodesly, thats fair comment as your opinion, and its only your opinion, no evidence offered. All the same its a welcome change from your childish tactics.

 

However, you still do not acknowledge that you frequently just regurgitate headlines which offer much the same, also you make no apology for your personal attack on me after being informed that the article that you were promoting as "gospel" regarding Steve Moore has since been exposed as the complete fantasy of a Walter Mitty type who whilst claiming to be an ex-FBI Agent has never held a post in law enforcement.

 

So nothing new there. Rhodesly, people might begin to respect you just a little if you admitted your failings in ignoring facts and then making arguments personal.

[Rhodes]

Loosely - Here's a date to put in your diary, 24 November, when Amanda's appeal is due to start

[Loose]

I wonder if you knew that the 24th November is the anniversary of Lee Harvey Oswald's death. I hope Amanda doesn't take it as a bad sign, one killer getting their just desserts and another hoping to escape justice.

Edited September 6, 2010 by loose

[Rhodes]

Loosely - You always try to be clever don't you and always want the last word like you did with the Akmal Shaikh case, make no mistake the Italian Judicial system will be quivering in their boots as Wednesday 24 November approaches!

[Loose]

Rhodesly - I did not think that there was any trying to it. Why do you have to constantly make this personal when you are losing an argument? As I said before, it is childlike. I doubt very much that the Italian Judicial Authorities have much to fear, it is their country and their system and if you are a representative example of campaigners then the only quivering will come when shaking with laughter.</div>

Edited September 7, 2010 by loose