Amanda Knox - Guilty or Innocent

[Loose]

Well Rhodesly it's quite obvious really because every single time when you post these news links that you either haven't actually read them yourself or you are relying on people not to. Every single time you misrepresent the facts and bend them to support your side of the story.

 

Surely you must realise that you are doing more to set people against Amanda than anyone else possibly could? Probably not.

[Horace]

Loosely - In what way am I misreporting the case, Amanda Knox didn't murder Meredith Kercher, why would she

 

Sometimes I think that you are being deliberately thick, then I remember that you are just thick all the time!

 

What Loose, I, and others are getting at is that you keep posting links to threads which you claim show that the woman is innocent, when they always present both sides of the argument. More sensible people than yourself can easily see this when they read the articles.

 

 

 

[Rhodes]

Okay, try this video link for size then from ABC News whereby a so called 'key eye witness', who placed Amanda and Raffaele Sollecito near to the scene of the crime on the night of the murder, has been discredited as a homeless drug addict and alcoholic. There is also an informative interview with Amanda's doting parents Edda and Curt, enjoy:

 

http://abcnews.go.com/GMA/video/major-development-amanda-knox-trial-american-college-student-convicted-murder-italy-13231825

[Horace]

Okay, try this video link for size then from ABC News whereby a so called 'key eye witness', who placed Amanda and Raffaele Sollecito near to the scene of the crime on the night of the murder, has been discredited as a homeless drug addict and alcoholic. There is also an informative interview with Amanda's doting parents Edda and Curt, enjoy:

 

http://abcnews.go.co...-italy-13231825

 

That's a better effort on your part Rhodes! At least it's all presented as positive for Miss Knox.

 

 

 

[Brounmoney]

I will say Rhodes is very one sided in this matter, but there is really nothing wrong with this. He has his views and is standing up for them. What more could you ask of someone. At least we know what we will get when it comes to Rhodes. We can not say that for everyone. Now I believe that Amanda is innocent of the murder, so in some ways I am with Rhodes, but I do try to look at the stuff that says she did do it. Now you guys have to understand that the articles that Rhodes post are going to be mostly one sided. Why would Rhodes want to post something that does not support his case. I mean most of the article is about her being innocent I expect nothing less from Rhodes and you guys should not either.

[missunderstood]

I will say Rhodes is very one sided in this matter, but there is really nothing wrong with this. He has his views and is standing up for them. What more could you ask of someone. At least we know what we will get when it comes to Rhodes. We can not say that for everyone. Now I believe that Amanda is innocent of the murder, so in some ways I am with Rhodes, but I do try to look at the stuff that says she did do it. Now you guys have to understand that the articles that Rhodes post are going to be mostly one sided. Why would Rhodes want to post something that does not support his case. I mean most of the article is about her being innocent I expect nothing less from Rhodes and you guys should not either.

 

 

Its becoming increasingly apparent to me that obscene amounts of money are being spent on expensive lawyers, image and media consultants and so called experts,and as money all too often speaks louder than the truth it could well be that a guilty person ends up being released.

 

If Amanda is innocent I hope she goes home very soon, but all the half truths, lies and hype created by the Knox side of the argument, with no thought given to the victims families feelings, could well have a negative influence on the final bearing of this case.

[Brounmoney]

I will say Rhodes is very one sided in this matter, but there is really nothing wrong with this. He has his views and is standing up for them. What more could you ask of someone. At least we know what we will get when it comes to Rhodes. We can not say that for everyone. Now I believe that Amanda is innocent of the murder, so in some ways I am with Rhodes, but I do try to look at the stuff that says she did do it. Now you guys have to understand that the articles that Rhodes post are going to be mostly one sided. Why would Rhodes want to post something that does not support his case. I mean most of the article is about her being innocent I expect nothing less from Rhodes and you guys should not either.

 

 

Its becoming increasingly apparent to me that obscene amounts of money are being spent on expensive lawyers, image and media consultants and so called experts,and as money all too often speaks louder than the truth it could well be that a guilty person ends up being released.

 

If Amanda is innocent I hope she goes home very soon, but all the half truths, lies and hype created by the Knox side of the argument, with no thought given to the victims families feelings, could well have a negative influence on the final bearing of this case.

 

 

You could not be more right about money. Money can buy you a lot of things in this world and freedom is one of them. If there is one lesson that I have learned from the American court system it would be that money and knowing the right people can get you out of about anything. I really don't know if Amanda did or not. The one thing that I did not like from the first time they put her on trial was the very bad job they did with the crime scene. I mean Amanda could have been proven with out a shadow of a doubt of being guilty or innocent, but no there are still way too many questions. Because of that big mess up we will never really know I don't think. What is now going to happen is what misunderstood said. If Amanda' s lawyers get paid enough they can make her innocnet. The same goes for the other side if they put enough time and money into it things will not chance. I just think we have come to the point were the truth will never be told.

Edited March 28, 2011 by Brounmoney

[missunderstood]

I will say Rhodes is very one sided in this matter, but there is really nothing wrong with this. He has his views and is standing up for them. What more could you ask of someone. At least we know what we will get when it comes to Rhodes. We can not say that for everyone. Now I believe that Amanda is innocent of the murder, so in some ways I am with Rhodes, but I do try to look at the stuff that says she did do it. Now you guys have to understand that the articles that Rhodes post are going to be mostly one sided. Why would Rhodes want to post something that does not support his case. I mean most of the article is about her being innocent I expect nothing less from Rhodes and you guys should not either.

 

 

Its becoming increasingly apparent to me that obscene amounts of money are being spent on expensive lawyers, image and media consultants and so called experts,and as money all too often speaks louder than the truth it could well be that a guilty person ends up being released.

 

If Amanda is innocent I hope she goes home very soon, but all the half truths, lies and hype created by the Knox side of the argument, with no thought given to the victims families feelings, could well have a negative influence on the final bearing of this case.

 

 

You could not be more right about money. Money can buy you a lot of things in this world and freedom is one of them. If there is one lesson that I have learned from the American court system it would be that money and knowing the right people can get you out of about anything. I really don't know if Amanda did or not. The one thing that I did not like from the first time they put her on trial was the very bad job they did with the crime scene. I mean Amanda could have been proven with out a shadow of a doubt of being guilty or innocent, but no there are still way too many questions. Because of that big mess up we will never really know I don't think. What is now going to happen is what misunderstood said. If Amanda' s lawyers get paid enough they can make her innocnet. The same goes for the other side if they put enough time and money into it things will not chance. I just think we have come to the point were the truth will never be told.

 

 

I agree with everything you say, and I honestly believe that in the UK the laws are made by the rich, almost entirely for the benefit of the rich.

What a sad world we all live in.

[Rhodes]

It's good banter folks but unfortunately Loosely will be on soon to ruin it all, he's just one of these know it all types who wants to be right all the time!

[Horace]

It's good banter folks but unfortunately Loosely will be on soon to ruin it all, he's just one of these know it all types who wants to be right all the time!

 

Well that's sure to provoke him, but then I guess that's what you're trying to do!

 

 

 

[Loose]

It's good banter folks but unfortunately Loosely will be on soon to ruin it all, he's just one of these know it all types who wants to be right all the time!

 

Well that's sure to provoke him, but then I guess that's what you're trying to do!

 

 

 

 

Rhodes needs the attention, it's the only sort he can get.

[Brounmoney]

It's good banter folks but unfortunately Loosely will be on soon to ruin it all, he's just one of these know it all types who wants to be right all the time!

 

Well that's sure to provoke him, but then I guess that's what you're trying to do!

 

 

 

 

Rhodes needs the attention, it's the only sort he can get.

 

 

Wow is there any way a real discussion could happen on this site? I mean really.

[Loose]

It's good banter folks but unfortunately Loosely will be on soon to ruin it all, he's just one of these know it all types who wants to be right all the time!

 

Well that's sure to provoke him, but then I guess that's what you're trying to do!

 

 

 

 

Rhodes needs the attention, it's the only sort he can get.

 

 

Wow is there any way a real discussion could happen on this site? I mean really.

 

 

Well you're only here for an argument aren't you USA? Admit it, you love it.

 

Oops, did I really engage with you? Oh fu*k!

Edited March 28, 2011 by Loose

[Rhodes]

Loosely - Just to show that I have painstakingly examined both sides of the story, I attach a link which indicates that Amanda and Meredith Kercher fell out over housework and boyfriends in the weeks leading up to Meredith's murder. Apparently Amanda often skipped her turn to clean the bathroom and would sometimes bring men home whilst Meredith was meticulous about cleaning and never brought boyfriends back. Amanda and Meredith got along pretty well when they first moved into the house however relations later deteriorated over the cleaning roster as Amanda and Meredith shared a bathroom:

 

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/4549136/Amanda-Knox-and-Meredith-Kercher-fell-out-over-housework-third-flatmate-says.html

[Brounmoney]

It's good banter folks but unfortunately Loosely will be on soon to ruin it all, he's just one of these know it all types who wants to be right all the time!

 

Well that's sure to provoke him, but then I guess that's what you're trying to do!

 

 

 

 

Rhodes needs the attention, it's the only sort he can get.

 

 

Wow is there any way a real discussion could happen on this site? I mean really.

 

 

Well you're only here for an argument aren't you USA? Admit it, you love it.

 

Oops, did I really engage with you? Oh fu*k!

 

 

No I am not here fight with you or anyone else. I started posting to talk about the Knox case, but very soon I found out that there is not much of that going on. I just wish we could talk about the Knox case, and if we don't agree on that it is fine. There is no way we will agree.

[Rhodes]

Well you're only here for an argument aren't you USA? Admit it, you love it.

Loosely - You have to admit though that Brounmoney's arrival on the Forum and contribution to this thread has been welcome so as to get a US perspective on the case, he seems a decent down to earth chap who just wants to see justice done at the end of the day

[Rhodes]

Wow is there any way a real discussion could happen on this site? I mean really.

Brounmoney - Don't worry, you don't know Loosely as well as the rest of us do on this Forum and if you stay with us long enough, depending on when Amanda Knox is released I guess, you will soon get used to him

[Loose]

Well if you think so Rhodesly but then he does tend to support your "blinkered" approach. Let's face it, he knows very little about the case, refuses to actually discuss any of the evidence against Knox, came on here and was abusive from the word go and I wouldn't be surprised if you googled his username and saw similar instances elsewhere and for my money has spent more time pushing his brand of christianity down our throats. I've no intention of engaging with him again, he's even crazier than you and you're a shithouse rat Cliffy.

 

If he wants to discuss the case as he claims then let him get on with it, nothing stopping him except he wants a fight over some perceived slight, so far thats all he wants to discuss.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Appreciate your recent attempt to be more balanced with the old Telegraph article but as a motive it always seemed a bit thin to me but then who knows with these kids these days. Look at recent stabbings of teenagers here in the UK for showing "disrespect", just looking at people ffs, it's a bit of a jump to having the serious hump because of taking criticism over cleaning the bathroom.

[Brounmoney]

Well if you think so Rhodesly but then he does tend to support your "blinkered" approach. Let's face it, he knows very little about the case, refuses to actually discuss any of the evidence against Knox, came on here and was abusive from the word go and I wouldn't be surprised if you googled his username and saw similar instances elsewhere and for my money has spent more time pushing his brand of christianity down our throats. I've no intention of engaging with him again, he's even crazier than you and you're a shithouse rat Cliffy.

 

If he wants to discuss the case as he claims then let him get on with it, nothing stopping him except he wants a fight over some perceived slight, so far thats all he wants to discuss.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Appreciate your recent attempt to be more balanced with the old Telegraph article but as a motive it always seemed a bit thin to me but then who knows with these kids these days. Look at recent stabbings of teenagers here in the UK for showing "disrespect", just looking at people ffs, it's a bit of a jump to having the serious hump because of taking criticism over cleaning the bathroom.

 

 

 

Well loose if you would look ay my past post in the last month than you would know that my post have had nothing to do with my believes and have had a nice discussion about Obama which I disagreed with Rhodes. I thought we put our disagreements behind us, but I guess you did not. No I do not completely agree with Rhodes on everything. I am new to this case, and am trying to learn more.

[Rhodes]

Brounmoney - Did you happen to see this link with the pictures of Amanda's Court appearance last Saturday, she seemed relaxed and cool calm and collected didn't she and must know that she has the crooked Italian Judiciary on the back foot, it's noticeable isn't it that her legal team have upped their game recently particularly where they exposed the so called 'key eye witness' as a homeless fraud, drug addict and alcoholic:

 

http://www.seattlepi.com/local/gallery.asp?SubID=6512&page=46&GTitle=Amanda%20Knox%20in%20court&pubdate=3/26/2011