Amanda Knox - Guilty or Innocent

[Big J R]

Ditto, Karen !

 

..... (and now we're on Page 118 of this fascinating saga !!)

Edited June 3, 2014 by Big J R

[Loose]

Ditto, Karen !

 

..... (and now we're on Page 118 of this fascinating saga !!)

Look who is spamming the thread! 87 posts of BS 

[Rhodes]

During a Conference for Trial Attorneys at the famous John Marshall Law School in Chicago this week it was made abundantly clear in a key note speech and presentation that Italian Police investigating the death of Meredith made multiple errors in handling DNA evidence. The presentation by Greg Hampikian and Tom Zupancic focused on errors made in collecting DNA at the crime scene that compromised the investigation and no doubt caused Police to reach erroneous conclusions or allowed the evidence to be manipulated. Attorneys at the high profile event were stunned to hear how incompetent Italian forensic analysts and prosecutors connected to the case manipulated and withheld evidence, one stated 'such behavior would never have been tolerated in the American system, it shows an inherent contempt for fairness and the concept of justice and is a serious breach of acceptable judicial practices':

 

http://www.komonews.com/news/local/Experts-DNA-evidence-used-against-Amanda-Knox-seriously-flawed-261708911.html?abc=lTA8fR4B

[Loose]

Guantanamo Bay and the various other Rendition Facilities the US have placed prisoners without trials or recourse to solicitors is a serious breach of acceptable judicial practices I suppose.

 

Trouble with Yanks is that they like their cake and eat it.

[Rhodes]

Loosely – Yes but not to the extent poor Amanda and Rafaelle have been treated and victimised by the Italians, the criminals ‘housed’ at Guantanamo Bay and other such like facilities in the US deserve to be there for one reason or another

[Big J R]

Guantanamo Bay and the various other Rendition Facilities the US have placed prisoners without trials or recourse to solicitors is a serious breach of acceptable judicial practices I suppose.

 

Trouble with Yanks is that they like their cake and eat it.

 

 

.............so we'd better not mention Britain allowing the CIA the use of Stanstead Airport to make their rendition flights for interrogation purposes abroad a bit esasier a few years ago.

 

 

OOOOPS  -  I just have !!,

[Loose]

.............so we'd better not mention Britain allowing the CIA the use of Stanstead Airport to make their rendition flights for interrogation purposes abroad a bit esasier a few years ago.

 

 

OOOOPS  -  I just have !!,

Quite right, best buddies do buddies a favour. 

 

 

Loosely – Yes but not to the extent poor Amanda and Rafaelle have been treated and victimised by the Italians, the criminals ‘housed’ at Guantanamo Bay and other such like facilities in the US deserve to be there for one reason or another

I'm afraid that none of us know anything of the sort Rhodesly, at least 'Manda & Rafa got to see solicitors after they viciously deprived a young girl of her right to live. The Detainees are all under suspicion until they've been tried in any courts of law and they have been completely denied justice. Meredith was denied any chance of justice by Knox and her accomplices.

[Rhodes]

More coverage of the high profile Conference for Trial Attorneys at the John Marshall Law School in Chicago on 29 May where the handling of DNA evidence was absolutely ridiculed by top US experts, enjoy:

 

http://wrongfulconvictionnews.com/amanda-knox-raffaele-sollecito-case-discussed-at-dna-conference-in-chicago/

[Karen Browne]

Still flogging this dead horse Mr Rhodes - the jury decided she's GUILTY

[Rhodes]

If you thought we were bad on here folks check out the debate on this Forum, the only difference being that members know their onions concerning the case and what they're talking about:

 

http://websleuths.com/forums/showthread.php?t=242620&page=13

[Karen Browne]

the only difference being that members know their onions concerning the case and what they're talking about:

 

Your spot on Mr Rhodes following taken from your link

Meredith Kercher had her life destroyed. Patrick Lumumba had his life destroyed. Knox destroyed her own life by participating in a murder and lying to investigators during a murder investigation.

[Loose]

Your spot on Mr Rhodes following taken from your link

Meredith Kercher had her life destroyed. Patrick Lumumba had his life destroyed. Knox destroyed her own life by participating in a murder and lying to investigators during a murder investigation.

From the horses mouth itself it would seem. If they know so much more than we mere mortals then we can't argue with that summary. 

[Rhodes]

Your spot on Mr Rhodes following taken from your link

Meredith Kercher had her life destroyed. Patrick Lumumba had his life destroyed. Knox destroyed her own life by participating in a murder and lying to investigators during a murder investigation.

Karen - Yes but there's always one isn't there!

[Karen Browne]

Karen - Yes but there's always one isn't there!

 

Funny I thought the jury was made up of 12 people - just get off your soapbox Mr Rhodes the verdict was GUILTY

[cup of tea]

If you are doing this as a wind-up Rhodes then isn't it getting a bit wearing after 118 pages?

Admire your stamina though!

[Rhodes]

Cup of Tea - I've never been more serious about something in my life!

[cup of tea]

Fair enough

[Rhodes]

Cup of Tea - Like I've said before what if it was your daughter or son who had been wrongly convicted of a murder they clearly didn't commit, you wouldn't just sit on your hands would you

[Ian_W]

Why ask different people the same question?

 

Any decent person would support their child, yet at the same time you would expect your child to serve the time and once released you would support them to rebuild their lives as a free person.

[Loose]

Knox was found Guilty however.