Amanda Knox - Guilty or Innocent

[Loose]

Yawn

I know how you feel Karen. Rhodesly is squirming on the end of the line trying desperately to avoid the question of why he's so interested in other people being parents when he's such a sad failure himself.

 

 

So what have her parents to do with the topic which, if you can recall was Amanda Knox - Guilty or innocent (sic).

 

What does parenting have to do with whether or not she committed the murder Rhodesly? Were they there?

 

Anyway, as I said when you introduced the topic of parents I really enjoy you showing yourself up since your record on being one is so poor. Do you have any plans to bring their child support up to date with their mother?

 

Any chance of an answer to this Rhodesly? Too ashamed? 

 

Bit too close to home for you?

[Rhodes]

Karen - Yes, I couldn't agree with you more, lets get back to the topic and I see that the murder case has an extensive Wikipedia page with numerous links, it's worth a look:

 

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Murder_of_Meredith_Kercher

[Loose]

Karen - Yes, I couldn't agree with you more, lets get back to the topic and I see that the murder case has an extensive Wikipedia page with numerous links, it's worth a look:

 

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Murder_of_Meredith_Kercher

Desperate not to answer the question.

 

Wonder why.

 

Let's all talk about what it means to be a parent shall we? What's it like Rhodesly when you make your children homeless because you gamble the rent away Rhodesly?

[Rhodes]

Let's all talk about what it means to be a parent shall we? What's it like Rhodesly when you make your children homeless because you gamble the rent away Rhodesly?

Loosely – What on earth are you going on about, members are finally seeing your true colours aren’t they. I genuinely feel sorry for you as clearly you’ve got a huge chip on your shoulder

.

[Loose]

Loosely – What on earth are you going on about, members are finally seeing your true colours aren’t they. I genuinely feel sorry for you as clearly you’ve got a huge chip on your shoulder

.

Clifford dear boy, you can hardly be in a position to complain after criticising others in your own view of failing to be prepared to support children when you've been such an abject failure yourself. Notably swerving the questions matters not, far from others throwing their kids to the wolves you've actually thrown yours on the street in preference of your own selfish interests.

 

If there's a message for you here it is that you've been exposed as a total hypocrite.

[Big J R]

Double Yawn, Karen !!

 

(and we're on Page 115 now !!)

[Rhodes]

Big J R – I reiterate that I couldn’t agree more, I don’t know what has come over Loosely, it’s too late for a mid-life crisis isn’t it but, as I said, at least members are now seeing him for the true person and bully he is.

Now lets get back to discussing the topic of our heroine Amanda Knox!

[Karen Browne]

Now lets get back to discussing the topic of our heroine Amanda Knox! - I believe this is the YAWN and not your obsession with Loosey

[Loose]

Big J R – I reiterate that I couldn’t agree more, I don’t know what has come over Loosely, it’s too late for a mid-life crisis isn’t it but, as I said, at least members are now seeing him for the true person and bully he is.

Now lets get back to discussing the topic of our heroine Amanda Knox!

Shame you can't just hold your hands up Rhodesly but by all means if you've got anything to discuss about the topic of Foxy Knoxy then by all means excepting that you don't attempt to lecture other people on a subject you know nowt about.

 

Now, let's get back to discussing the evil murderer 'Manda, her crew of shameless supporters and her corrupt PR Agency.

Edited April 29, 2014 by Loose

[Loose]

Double Yawn, Karen !!

 

(and we're on Page 115 now !!)

If you've got anything worth contributing then lets hear it JR, otherwise opening a topic you are bored of can only be blamed on yourself can't it?

 

Maybe one of your "I'll get my coat" gifs eh?

[Loose]

Now then, it appears that Rhodesly is a bit slow off the mark today with the news that the Florence Court have today explained their reasons for convicting Knox of murder.

 

http://www.ctvnews.ca/world/italian-court-that-convicted-amanda-knox-explains-why-1.1797479

 

Happy reading for all of you interested readers, particularly Big ole JR. 

[Karen Browne]

I'm sure Mr Rhodes will give us his 'spin' on this

 

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-27215680

[Hookey]

"GUILTY" M'Lud.

Edited April 30, 2014 by Hookey

[Big J R]

Now then, it appears that Rhodesly is a bit slow off the mark today with the news that the Florence Court have today explained their reasons for convicting Knox of murder.

 

http://www.ctvnews.ca/world/italian-court-that-convicted-amanda-knox-explains-why-1.1797479

 

Happy reading for all of you interested readers, particularly Big ole JR. 

 

 

After reading up again on the case, and after that recent fascinating TV programme, I have no doubt that she is guilty.

 

Sorry, Rhodsey, but you must be in the minority.

[Rhodes]

I'm sure Mr Rhodes will give us his 'spin' on this

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-27215680

That's probably the most ridiculous thing I have ever read in my life, how could they possibly know whether poor Meredith was killed following a violent quarrel and that she had fought tooth and nail with Amanda over money on the night of the slaying, honestly!

[Loose]

337 pages. I bet that's a good informed read. I'll see if I can get hold of a translation in the next few weeks Rhodesly.

 

I expect it is what is known as evidence that gave the judges something to go on Rhodesly, they don't just pick it out of thin air.

 

I seem to remember a much earlier article with regard an ongoing argument over money, wouldn't like to libel but I have a  feeling that someone was helping themselves to shopping they hadn't bought.

[Rhodes]

but I have a  feeling that someone was helping themselves to shopping they hadn't bought

Well that's hardly crime of the century is it

[Loose]

Well that's hardly crime of the century is it

I don't think anyone claimed it was Rhodesly, but there you go getting the wrong end of the stick again.

 

I think it is possible that the person being found out obviously did not take it well if it ends in a killing Rhodesly. Which kind of shows how unstable some people are.

 

Personally I think you can see it in Knox's eyes, she's not quite the full sandwich.

[Rhodes]

Here's an excellent Blog folks which includes the question 'would you let your daughter go back to stand trial again'. Amanda's trusted lawyers obviously didn't plea for her to attend Court in Florence in January as her devoted family and advisors rightly decided against it, our heroine was unceremoniously convicted of a crime in Perugia that there was absolutely no evidence she committed and overwhelming evidence that she did not, all of which was totally ignored by the incompetent Italian Police and seemingly 'crooked' prosecutors. Amanda served four years of her young life in prison before an appeals Court concluded that she and Raffaele were not only not guilty according to the technicalities of the law but actually innocent. Then, in what would be double jeopardy in the US, the Italian Supreme Court of Cassation in Rome decided that she and Raffaele must undergo another trial in a ruling that was a blueprint especially designed to wrongly convict the pair again:

 

http://mindhuntersinc.com/pandering-to-existing-beliefs/

[Loose]

Don't you think it is interesting Rhodesly that people can now be tried again after a not guilty verdict in the UK?