IRAQ.

[AFF]

I seem to recall that you and that lunatic from The Sun are/were in favour of us good guys in the West invading any country that fulfills all of the following criteria:

 

Possession of Weapons of Mass Distraction; Under the un-democratic control of the most dangerous man on the planet; major oil-producer.

 

Well. In a speech that was briefly reported on Friday, I gather that the President of the USA said that Iraq's WoMD were looted in the the first few days after the 'downfall' of Saddam and are 'at large' in the country.

 

Therefore, according to my reckoning, Iraq now fulfills all of the criteria.

 

Do you think that we should consider 'going in' again?

[Colin Zeal EFM]

No. I think we should put Saddam back.

 

 

[pabird]

I think every one should pull out leaving Tony Blair as President of Iraq but no repeat no passport

[CANV EFM]

i think out boys should 'invade' themslves all the way home..

they could pop through syria then down through israel , sorting all that out.. whizz up thru suez (some unfinished business there) a quick trip down the med to shore up gibraltar, up thru spain to deal with the basques.. sort out the french farmers and home in time for tea and biscuits HURRAH and HUZZAH!!!

[Urchino]

I have an idea lets invite every terrorist in the world to Britain. Then not be able to remove or assinate the terror leaders not be able to retalitate when heavy rocks are thrown. Not be able to march into the areas through fear of the UN jumping on ya back be surrounded by countries that Hate you.

[Colin Zeal EFM]

I think we should've just allowed Saddam to continue making chemical weapons. Allowing him to blow us all to pieces in a few years time would be a much better option than nipping it in the bud now.

 

 

[AFF]

Quote:

I think we should've just allowed Saddam to continue making chemical weapons.

Hi CZ.

Where do/did you get your information, Zealster?

Clearly not from Hans Blix. Perhaps it was the sixth form student in Mexico c 1992 via the internet that Tone took his information from to produce the second dossier.

Those looters moved fast to get the Weapons of Mass Distraction hidden within 44 minutes.

[Colin Zeal EFM]

Quote:

Perhaps it was the sixth form student in Mexico c 1992 via the internet

Did the internet exist in 1992??

[Urchino]

Maybe if Saddam had this forum there wouldn't be a problem!

I was pro-war but now i think we should have left Saddam in charge what a bunch of ungratefull gits!

[AFF]

Yes, Urchino.

 

Some expected the scattering of rose petals at the feet of the liberators in gratitude. Hasn't happened yet, by all accounts. Those in favour of the invasion probably take some comfort that at least the Iraqi people are free from tyranny and the world is a safer place.

 

Or not.

[GHA EFM]

Quote:

what a bunch of ungratefull gits

Yes, thank you so much for bombing our country, a country that is of absolutley no threat to you at all. That you for conquering, I mean liberating, us from tyranny. Thank you for killing so many Iraqis in order to kill Saddam Hussein and to find the Weapons of Mass Distraction.


Oh, by the way.

That whole 'Millenium Bug' thing, that was going to bring down the world when the clocks struck midnight and we moved into the new millenium. Was that 'nipped in the bud' as well?

[Colin Zeal EFM]

Wondered when your cage would get rattled, GHA. <img src="/forums/images/graemlins/frown.gif" alt="" />

 

No, you're obviously right, GHA. After all, sixth form students are never wrong, are they?

 

As I said, maybe we should've just allowed Saddam to continue making chemical weapons, allowing him to blow us all to pieces in a few years time. <img src="/forums/images/graemlins/frown.gif" alt="" />

 

 

[AFF]

Quote:

Quote:

I think we should've just allowed Saddam to continue making chemical weapons.

Hi CZ.

Where do/did you get your information, Zealster?

Clearly not from Hans Blix. Perhaps it was the sixth form student in Mexico c 1992 via the internet that Tone took his information from to produce the second dossier.

Those looters moved fast to get the Weapons of Mass Distraction hidden within 44 minutes.

As I said..............

[Colin Zeal EFM]

Errr... I read that the first time, AFF.

 

How often does Hans Blix usually contact you then?? <img src="/forums/images/graemlins/grin.gif" alt="" />

 

 

[Urchino]

They jump in the streets get US tanks to pull down a statue loot Saddams palaces and then say clear off.

 

Every nation that signed 1441 excepted that they had weapons just disagreed on how to get rid of them i have no interest what so ever in whether Saddam had weapons where all going to die at least let it be an interesting death.

I am more conceraned that the end to tyranical leader is gone!

[GHA EFM]

Quote:

Errr... I read that the first time, AFF.

How come you didn't answer the question then?

Quote:

Wondered when your cage would get rattled, GHA.

<img src="/forums/images/graemlins/confused.gif" alt="" /> I don't know about that, Zeal. I only just got here.

Who told you sixth form students are never wrong?

Quote:

maybe we should've just allowed Saddam to continue making chemical weapons, allowing him to blow us all to pieces in a few years time.

Would you've been happy if 'we' allowed Saddam to continue dismantling and destroying the missiles that he had?

[Colin Zeal EFM]

Quote:

They jump in the streets get US tanks to pull down a statue loot Saddams palaces and then say clear off.

Every nation that signed 1441 excepted that they had weapons just disagreed on how to get rid of them i have no interest what so ever in whether Saddam had weapons where all going to die at least let it be an interesting death.
I am more conceraned that the end to tyranical leader is gone!

AFF and GHA don't care about any of that, Urchino. You're wasting your breath. <img src="/forums/images/graemlins/frown.gif" alt="" />

[GHA EFM]

On the contrary, Zeal.

 

Quote:

I am more conceraned that the end to tyranical leader is gone!

 

Ben. That is a fantastic point. You are concerned that the 'a tyrannical leader is gone.'

 

Zeal. You're worried that in a few years' time we are all going to be 'blown to pieces?'

 

I know which of the two gives more of a just cause for war.

[Colin Zeal EFM]

Do you disagree that a tyrannical leader has gone then, GHA? Are you so blind that you can't see that there were over 20 years of atrocities under the rule of Saddam Hussein??

 

 

[GHA EFM]

You've changed your angle a bit there, Zeal.

 

I was saying that Ben's pro-war stance was due to the fact that he wanted a tyrannical leader removed from power. Which is fair enough. Your pro-war stance seems to be that you're a bit worried that in a few years Saddam Hussein may finally have the capabilities to 'blow us all to pieces.'