JOKYNGTON MANOR

[zezi]

Who do you play for? did you play for tok last season?

[royals26]

..... and who were the TWO supporters ?

 

... by what was being written earlier on this thread, there seemed to be a few dozen 'sources' reporting back from the game -

 

 

- were they all hiding behind those mass piles of Rhodes's unsold proggies??

[dobber]

Originally Posted By: NewBradwell

Bradwell should have been 3.0 up before they took the lead. TK Manor went 3 up front and were resorting to the long Ball. we fully deserved the win anyone who says different was not at the game and dobber you were there as you was wearing the number 2 shirt for tm before you left without warming down as you had spat the dummy.

Ha Ha,Nice one...unfortunately that wasnt me though.Will have to ring my mate in the morning and see who you got me confused with

[Rhodes]

Originally Posted By: royals26

- were they all hiding behind those mass piles of Rhodes's unsold proggies??

I did 60 programmes so if you want to PM me your address I'll happily send you one and that goes for anybody else on here

[royals26]

Many thanks for the offer - but though I may be classed as an 'Anorak' - I'm not one of the 'paper-chaser' variety - I feel I need to 'earn' a Prog. by actually attending the ground.

 

In Tok M's case this is now unlikely in the near future, since I've done Hanwell's ground a couple of times.

 

Ta

[Lato]

rhodes did the 60 you produced include those available for both teams and officials. Even if it did it sounds a bit of an excessive number.

 

Not a good start for Tokyngton but it's only one game. Looking forward to seeing what happens on Wednesday as it's one of the few matches I'll be able to see live in the next two years.

[Willo the Cat]

Originally Posted By: Rhodes

Originally Posted By: royals26

- were they all hiding behind those mass piles of Rhodes's unsold proggies??

I did 60 programmes so if you want to PM me your address I'll happily send you one and that goes for anybody else on here

Get in there quick people theres only 59 left

How many pages Rhodes?

[Rhodes]

Originally Posted By: Willo the Cat

How many pages Rhodes?

Willo the Cat - Nice to hear from you, what are you doing with yourself these days. Not quite the 84 pages of Kentish Town days, only 40 yesterday but a lot of colour photographs.

[Loose]

No sign of what would usually be a full-on crowing match report from our intrepid Rhodes yet on their shock defeat yesterday?

 

Funny how standards slip.

[Rhodes]

Quote:

Fancy a first day ever programme cover ?
On Tuesday evening Premier Division suppoted by Sportsform, Southill Alexander will mark their first ever home game at the Carlsberg Stadium where they entertain their landlords Biggleswade Town's Capital League side in a pre-season friendly by issuing a match day programme free with your entry.

Loosely - Talking of programmes I came across this snippet of information, would it be possible to send me a progamme in the post if I PM you my address. Out of interest why are you making extra work for yourself this season when it's not obligatory to issue a programme for your level of football or is it just to show off.

[Loose]

I suppose that its one of the reasons that you could not see yourself fitting in at Southill Alexander Clifford, we neither. We have an over-abundance of people behind the scenes willing to work on all manner of projects promoting the club. Showing off if you like to call it that, we prefer to call it adding value.

 

I can't see myself doing you any favours but you will be more than welcome to pick one up free with entry admission if you visit one of Southill Alexanders home games this season.

 

Still no Match Report Clifford? It must have been a shock for you, a huge diappointment. Perhaps its taken the wind out of your usually bloated sails.

[Rhodes]

Originally Posted By: loosely

We have an over-abundance of people behind the scenes willing to work on all manner of projects promoting the club

Loosely - That's exactly why I wasn't interested in getting involved with the Club when it changed direction from the original Edgware Town project as the writing was very much on the wall. There are far too many cooks involved at the Carlsberg Stadium and I have a suspicion that they will end up spoiling the broth sooner rather than later.

[Loose]

Organisation and discipline Rhodes. Two attributes you do not enjoy. That and the committment to produce what you promise.

 

Of course you could not cope in that environment Cliffy, be shown up too quickly and found out for what you are. A hopelesssly snide windbag.

 

Still, Tokyngton will find that out for themselves.

[Rhodes]

Loosely - You've said a lot of 'hurtful' things recently trying to put my nose out of joint and throw me off guard but you're fighting a losing battle. Members on here can see through you a mile away and you're not really a football man in the true sense of the word are you, you just enjoy the buzz of swanning around football grounds, sorry park pitches in the Bedfordshire County League, and in particular the Boardroom at the Carlsberg Stadium, flashing the cash and being the big I am, wasn't it predominantly you who bankrolled the Club.

[Loose]

Clifford, that brought a tear to my eye. Still rolling around on the floor.

 

You seem to know so much about how our finances are set up. Just how much has Daddy Loose Warbucks put in then?

 

Rhodes, everyone has seen your weak and snide attempts to pour scorn on SAFC and the clubs of the Bedfordshire League I feel that it is you that people see through. We threw you out of the club because you were a snide, unproductive windbag, alienating others from SAFC. Now of course you cannot let it go.

 

I look forward to many years yet to come of your pathetic attempts to knock something good and altruistic.

[Rhodes]

Loosely - I'm not trying to knock the project or am I trying to pour scorn on the Club, far from it as I know your two Coaches and some of the players, why on earth would I want to see them do badly. It's what the Club stands for that isn't my cup of tea in particular the so called shareholders thing and being answerable to clueless hangers on from around the globe who just because they have paid their

[Loose]

Perhaps you can explain this post made by yourself on 3rd of May, two days after the launch of the SAFC Website. You seem to be implying that you felt that you were still associated with the club. Of course I can go back further if you like?

 

http://www.nonleague.co.uk/forums/ubbthrea...tml#Post1558368

 

You seemed to understand the rationale behind football fans from all over the world starting their own football club and having a say in how it was run.

 

Not sure what it has got to do with you how much people are prepared to pay for a website that does so much more than you quote but thankfully for us it seems, you won't be joining us.

 

We threw you out Rhodes, by the scruff of your virtual neck Clifford, as others have and will do again.

[boswell]

Perhaps you two could just pm each other all this crap and leave the rest of us in peace?

[Loose]

Not while Rhodes is allowed to promote his bile unmoderated. Some of us take the clubs we support and the leagues we play in seriously enough not to see them freely slandered.

 

If this site had decent moderators Rhodes lies would have been dealt with long ago.

 

Still, I apologise.

[The Doog is King]

 

Maybe UU/Bitch should resume moderating duties?

 

That would help the situation.....just like it did before....