Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support Fans Focus by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content

Al Qaeda II


Recommended Posts

My dictionery defines URCHIN, thus:

 

A SMALL MISCHIEVOUS CHILD: A POOR DIRTY RAGGED CHILD : A RAGGAMUFFIN

 

Archaic and Regional:- A HEDGEHOG !

 

Now that makes me think...........

Link to comment
Share on other sites

right urchino....let's get back to the main issue.....now you've had you're little left wing rant......

 

(do try and get facts before you post.......there's a good chap......)

 

the issue that I posted was this....

 

is it legal to discriminate between men and women....

 

No.....

 

is it legal to discriminate between any minority and/or majority group.....

 

No.......

 

so tell me....is it legal to have men and women entrances .........

 

No.........

 

is it legal to advertise a vacancy for a particular gender.....

 

No.......

 

(newspapers will not accept them and given that we spend 4 million pounds a year on advertising...I would probably think that I am right.....)

 

so....why is it legal to place 'men only' and 'women only' signs on a mosque....

 

it is not.....it is a breach of the sexual discrimination laws.....fact.....

 

who will get nicked first...the mosque or the 'capitalist hyenas'.... in Essex.......

 

 

ha ha ha ha....any bets...... <img src="/forums/images/graemlins/grin.gif" alt="" /> <img src="/forums/images/graemlins/grin.gif" alt="" /> <img src="/forums/images/graemlins/grin.gif" alt="" />

Link to comment
Share on other sites

To discrimanate i agree is fundimentally wrong but i do not class having diffrent entrances as discrimanation if one is paved with gold and one resembles a sewer then that is discrimanation!

 

But if both entrances are the same then it is not discrimanating against women not men.......

 

We have a right to make minority groups abide our legal laws not our own moral ones but having different entrances is hardly the biggest crime in the world.I beleive in allowing religions to partake in their views! except if is against the law ie (female circumstition)!

 

Urchino left behined

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Are you comparing our urchinettes to a Hedgehog ! <img src="/forums/images/graemlins/mad.gif" alt="" />

 

Our Urchinettes are the definition of Beauty and perfection <img src="/forums/images/graemlins/cool.gif" alt="" />

 

PS Please send the money to PO BOX 231..........hehe

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Unclean women are the ones I like best. The dirtier the better, I say! <img src="/forums/images/graemlins/laugh.gif" alt="" />

 

I think you will find that legislation on discrimation, both regarding gender and race, make specific reference to and attempts to alow for religious practice and indeed private sports and other clubs. I think it highly unlikely that the mosque you saw is breaking the law, which seems to be your objection.

 

Whether it is morally or ethically acceptable is a different matter and of course depends on one's own view, culture and beliefs. My own stance is actually anti-religion - all religion - and I do not believe that any religion, cult or faith should be above or excepted from the law, or even recognised in law. What any individual does in their spare time, or what they choose to believe in, is of course entirely their own business, no different to collecting stamps or railway engine numbers. No-one else, the state or any individual, is morally obliged to give such beliefs or ssuperstitions any credence or special exemption however.

 

Why anyone would WANT to have different entrances for different genders is beyond me, frankly, but if the place is effectively their own private club, and the men AND women genuinely and of their own free will (the tricky bit) want to go through different doors, well it's good news for the door industry and no skin off my nose.

 

Let the pubs open 11-11 on Sunday, I say!

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here's a point to ponder on sex and discrimination..

 

If girls can now wear trousers to school, why cant boys wear skirts !!

 

(Eddie Izzard, eat your heart out ! !!)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thank God there's no Scots on here Urchino.

 

I think they might have something to say on the matter !

 

I have nothing against 6th form girls wearing trousers to school, as long as they are TIGHT !!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

notice you got the '6th Form' in there BJR...

 

<img src="/forums/images/graemlins/grin.gif" alt="" /> <img src="/forums/images/graemlins/grin.gif" alt="" /> <img src="/forums/images/graemlins/grin.gif" alt="" /> <img src="/forums/images/graemlins/grin.gif" alt="" /> <img src="/forums/images/graemlins/grin.gif" alt="" /> <img src="/forums/images/graemlins/grin.gif" alt="" /> <img src="/forums/images/graemlins/grin.gif" alt="" />

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Rigid adherence to outdated r-scripture and poverty are the highest level risks the world faces in being devastated by world war(s)

Religeon was ever so with its ability to overcome democracy by brain washing

That much the simpler for the brain washers where the brains in question are held in either unrelenting poverty or over indulged middle class kids looking to do something/anything with their lives

The answers are simpler to explore than to put in place

To overcome poverty the rich countries work unselfishly with the poor countries in building the appropriate infrastructure for survival,some chance!!see if you are able to spot any intent by Blair,Bush or Chirac etc in the problems in Africa or Asia??

Middle class kids,easy get them sharing the toils of the poor and under privileged, Somehow get them to make a contribution via hard work (physical) but not for a week or two gain a commitment for a year or two of relentless graft in awful conditions and a minimum of 47/48 weeks a year and a minimum of ten hours a day

College education is wonderful, real life experience essential

So? why pick on poor little rich kids, Because much of the support for the brainwashers comes from educated but sadly inexperienced rich kids

Lifes realities become much easier to comprehend when constantly knackered

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Quite right Official !!

 

6th form only !

 

The thought of 6 months at Her Majesty's pleasure at my age ? I think NOT !!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just keep thinking of 6th form girls in tight trousers.

 

You'll get over it, Urchino !!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...