Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support Fans Focus by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Originally Posted By: Teflon
I agree HH, they have allowed the decision to be made on the pitch where it should be. No objections from any clubs at the time.

Merstham up and Molesey down, nothing else confirmed but there was a FA meeting yesterday regarding re-organisation, Godalming back to the Ryman which they were not too happy about as they believe its a harder league to get out of !!!


Wasnt that difficult last time. They finished bottom and got transferred !
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think it is wrong. Incomplete league has occurred because the CCL has let a club into the league that has no ground of there own and no means to pay things. The CCL is a joke and is making it very hard for me to stay in football. You either play all your games or you expunge the record.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Originally Posted By: SurreyLegend
I think it is wrong. Incomplete league has occurred because the CCL has let a club into the league that has no ground of there own and no means to pay things. The CCL is a joke and is making it very hard for me to stay in football. You either play all your games or you expunge the record.


Take a chill pill SL smile
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I cant. Been in a bad mood all day and then that result has tipped me over the edge. Got sent off in 5 a side last night as well. Slammed some blokes heads into the boards, by accident, and the ref said that if we were playing 11 a side he would send me off. I returned with, "no you wouldnt, because I would not be playing the sh*t level of Sunday div 5 that you are only capable of reffing" so off I went. Playing again tonight for my mates team who are playing one of his clients. He is a fool.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think the made the right decision, the clubs that would have been affected if points had been deducted had played there games against Neaseden, ok it's untidy that all these games are unplayed but would expunging the record be a better way, you'd all be arguing over the fact that Westfield gained out of it (ie only losing 3 points instead of possibly 6)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Shut up teffers and go away. They should of either finished their games or had their record expunged. Southall were in the same position and they were expunged. If it had an affect on the promotion places then unlucky. CCL should of done a few more checks on the teams they let in.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Originally Posted By: SurreyLegend
I cant. Been in a bad mood all day and then that result has tipped me over the edge. Got sent off in 5 a side last night as well. Slammed some blokes heads into the boards, by accident, and the ref said that if we were playing 11 a side he would send me off. I returned with, "no you wouldnt, because I would not be playing the sh*t level of Sunday div 5 that you are only capable of reffing" so off I went. Playing again tonight for my mates team who are playing one of his clients. He is a fool.



I see your mellowing SL biglaugh
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Problem with that is that any team can "prove" they can survive financially when they are relient on outside monies that dont get paid.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

At what point could Neasden prove that. They had no support and were ground sharing with Bedfont green. They had little or no support the year before at their own place. So at what point were the CCL committe idiots thinking that Neasden would be able to raise loads of cash. Answer me that and i will shut up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Cant answer that SL but they must have shown that the could survive and also the Bedfont Green who have been shafted again (Southall last year) so I think they would have asked some indepth questions.

 

Anyway how's the PMT grin

Link to comment
Share on other sites

seems to me from the rules on the coco website Neasden and anyone had to show plans for their own permanent ground before the share would be allowed.

 

Also says in there that the record "may" be expunged. Doesnt say "may" be allowed to stand

the Board "may " award points to the Club not at fault as if the match had been played and the League table shall reflect the position as if the match had been played with the result awarded by the Board.

 

I hope the committee of scrutineers do a better job with this years possible new comers to avoid this.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Tell me SL. Who voted Neasden in. Presuming by your stance that your club voted against them smile

 

Where you playing may have to come and watch wink

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...