Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support Fans Focus by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content

So here is an interesting thought.


Recommended Posts

In Div 1 lets take it that Staines finish in the top 2.

 

Westifeld win their last game 2-0 so finish below Hartley on Goal difference. Then Neasden have their records taken out after that has happened meaning that Westfield finish 3rd. Do Hartley put in a request to be promoted or challenge the decision is some way.

 

And if they do and win will the team relegated at Hartley's expense then claim against the league for that.

 

In my opinion I think they should promote both Westfield and Hartley.

 

Views ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Think it's a tuffy Kroons, I think that when Neasden have there record expunged they will put a clause that its a final decision and no team have right to appeal, who else can they do it ??

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think they should promote both of them especially as there grounds are now (allegedly) up to scratch but I think it will just be Westfield if they win and Neasden results are thrown out.

 

Then again expect anything - FFC were demoted from the Premier when the Ryman teams came in after finishing 2nd bottom BUT with Southall's results being expunged AND Mole Valley resigning hence third/fourth bottom which ever way you see it. I'm sure our groundshare was good enough at the time.

 

It's gonna be interesting but I would like to see teams go up and down otherwise the Premier bar 2/3 teams is just about friendlies after Xmas.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Originally Posted By: WackoJackoUK
I think they should promote both of them especially as there grounds are now (allegedly) up to scratch but I think it will just be Westfield if they win and Neasden results are thrown out.

Then again expect anything - FFC were demoted from the Premier when the Ryman teams came in after finishing 2nd bottom BUT with Southall's results being expunged AND Mole Valley resigning hence third/fourth bottom which ever way you see it. I'm sure our groundshare was good enough at the time.

It's gonna be interesting but I would like to see teams go up and down otherwise the Premier bar 2/3 teams is just about friendlies after Xmas.

Horley finished fifth that season and would have finished third as they beat Southall in the league.Then despite having set a deadline for ground improvements extended the deadline for some clubs but refused Horley.There are so many things I could bring up about that seasons constitution. Mind you it was worth the
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The best thing the coco could do is stick to their own rules or change them.

 

They cant do much about clubs falling into this league but they can control internal promotion and relegation. some seasons the prem will be one club less than others.

 

Relegate for sure and promote the top two or three ground qualified clubs wherever they finish.

 

You cant have the possibility of a premier club not finishing its fixtures.

 

If that happens the league are saying to clubs have a couple of cup runs and dont worry about the league, if you need the points come May play the game otherwise dont worry.

 

It seem Bookham or Reading wont get to host the champions, and that doesnt seem right.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Originally Posted By: thespursfan

You cant have the possibility of a premier club not finishing its fixtures.

If that happens the league are saying to clubs have a couple of cup runs and dont worry about the league, if you need the points come May play the game otherwise dont worry.

It seem Bookham or Reading wont get to host the champions, and that doesnt seem right.


Not quite sure what you are getting at here. What was supposed to happen to the cup games? Reading should have hosted the game on the 10/5 but their ground's not available - why??
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would promote both Hartley Wintney and Westfield. If i had to make a choice then it would be Hartley cos they have a proper stand.

 

Plus i may be playing there next season too. So am a little biased!!

 

Both got excellent playing surfaces !

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Originally Posted By: johnnojudo
I would promote both Hartley Wintney and Westfield. If i had to make a choice then it would be Hartley cos they have a proper stand.

Plus i may be playing there next season too. So am a little biased!!!


Johnno possibly leaving Ash UTD bigshock one of the clubs pillars leaving Johnno
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Originally Posted By: thespursfan
not having a go at Merstham, the cup games should have been played but so should the league games.


But when? Merstham (weather permitting) have been playing two games a week since early November because of all the cup runs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ash Utd's pitch was good on Saturday. Shame it's not up to that standard every week.

 

Change of manager next season and a few offers from other clubs is making me think i might have a change of scenary next season. Been at Ash 7 years and played over 350 games.

 

My judo is taking off again ie: the world masters in June then the Europeans in November. I may not be able to commit to the football club like i've done over all these years.

 

But you never know what might happen next season.....

 

If i do leave Ash it certainly will be a sad day for me.

Since i returned to football at 21 yrs old i've only ever been at 2 clubs,,,Farnborough town and Ash United.

 

Gussy has had more clubs this season........!!!

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Originally Posted By: thespursfan

I dont know why the Reading game wasnt fitted in earlier or why it's not available in a couple of weeks.
when was the original game due to have been played?


Originally scheduled for 22/4 where it was usurped by our reinstatement into the Surrey Senior Cup. Can't remember why the next date was unavailable although I think it was because of the League Cup final we were in. Third date was 10/5 when their ground is unavailable apparently.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Originally Posted By: johnnojudo
I would promote both Hartley Wintney and Westfield. If i had to make a choice then it would be Hartley cos they have a proper stand.

Plus i may be playing there next season too. So am a little biased!!

Both got excellent playing surfaces !


Pics of Hartley Wintney ground http://www.pyramidpassion.co.uk/html/hartley_wintney.html

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i realise its difficult and its not Mersthams fault if reading cant have their ground (cricket or athletics maybe)

 

if either side needed a point to stay up or go up it would have to be played.

 

is it fair on other sides in the cup and vase if in this case merstham dont play all their league games, and had a break when others didnt?

 

i seem to remember matches being postponed to give sides a chance to prepare for cup games but I cant recall who or when

 

both non league and scotland i think?

 

if reading cant play because of sharing with another sports club isnt that against league rules?

 

enforce the rules or change them

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...