Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support Fans Focus by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content

GWR Update


lovely stuff

Recommended Posts

Andy

 

I am not condoning what Rudi got sent off, For as I have said I didn't see it. I saw Rudi do the same as number 7 but I cannot believe that is what he got sent off for.

 

All I am saying is if the ref had blown up for the foul on Hammet Rudi might not have got sent off.

 

Similarly with Magona I suggested that the first yellow card was a harsh decision but perhaps he had been warned before.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Originally Posted By: Steph
Andy

I am not condoning what Rudi got sent off, For as I have said I didn't see it. I saw Rudi do the same as number 7 but I cannot believe that is what he got sent off for.

All I am saying is if the ref had blown up for the foul on Hammet Rudi might not have got sent off.

Similarly with Magona I suggested that the first yellow card was a harsh decision but perhaps he had been warned before.


Steph, young man.

Appreciate what you say but players must be disciplined enough not to rise to the occasion and believe that they should retaliate just because they believe the 'referee got it wrong'.

We won yesterday because of an opportunist goal and well done to Bryan for getting in there where it hurts. We will now lose two more players for a given period of time. How many more suspensions are there going to be before this is dealt with and who is going to pay the FA fine if we have one? Surely it's not going to come from the hard earned cash from the supporters!

Don't forget, if you were to ask the GWR supporters who were at the Railway end during the second half, then they will tell you we should have been down to 8 men. We were lucky the ref' missed that one.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Originally Posted By: Steph
He might have been on hallucinogenic real ale but I believe that this photo does demonstrate the incident prior to Rudi's sending off.

Note the position of the ball and the number 7 leg

http://www.flickr.com/photos/jancyclops/2096103917/in/photostream/

The ref should consider if he had blown for this foul would Rudi have got a red?


Exactly what does that prove? it looks like a shot from strictly come dancing!

I must get a pair of those rose tinted specs, is Arky selling them in the shop?
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Originally Posted By: Steph

As for Ossie's yellow that really was a bad misjudgement. The ref was a long way behind the play at that time and may have seen it differently from me. I saw Ossie go in hard and determined but fairly for a 50-50 ball. At it was the keeper, who at the time was a normal outfield player as he was out of the area and could not handle the ball, got there first and kicked the ball away. The keeper, who was equally determined, went down before Ossie reached him and Ossie's momentum on the wet pitch carried him through. There was no injury as i recall and the goalie was not hurt. You could say it was a foul but a yellow. Football is not a non-contact sport.



Slight flaw in your argument Steph..... Foster wasn't cautioned.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Originally Posted By: Father Jack
Originally Posted By: Steph

As for Ossie's yellow that really was a bad misjudgement. The ref was a long way behind the play at that time and may have seen it differently from me. I saw Ossie go in hard and determined but fairly for a 50-50 ball. At it was the keeper, who at the time was a normal outfield player as he was out of the area and could not handle the ball, got there first and kicked the ball away. The keeper, who was equally determined, went down before Ossie reached him and Ossie's momentum on the wet pitch carried him through. There was no injury as i recall and the goalie was not hurt. You could say it was a foul but a yellow. Football is not a non-contact sport.



Slight flaw in your argument Steph..... Foster wasn't cautioned.


...and Iwould confirm that!!
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Originally Posted By: Jim Cunneen
Originally Posted By: Father Jack
Originally Posted By: Steph

As for Ossie's yellow that really was a bad misjudgement. The ref was a long way behind the play at that time and may have seen it differently from me. I saw Ossie go in hard and determined but fairly for a 50-50 ball. At it was the keeper, who at the time was a normal outfield player as he was out of the area and could not handle the ball, got there first and kicked the ball away. The keeper, who was equally determined, went down before Ossie reached him and Ossie's momentum on the wet pitch carried him through. There was no injury as i recall and the goalie was not hurt. You could say it was a foul but a yellow. Football is not a non-contact sport.



Slight flaw in your argument Steph..... Foster wasn't cautioned.


...and Iwould confirm that!!


I'd be more surprised if you didn't confirm it as Father jack is your source of information too!
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well done on bouncing back with 3 points on Saturday lads!! A hard earned win by all accounts. Well done to Bryan for answering the critics during/after last week's game

 

Sounds like it was a game not to be missed, gutted I did miss out!! What formation did we play then? Was it 3-5-2?

 

I take it Bast was injured or suspended?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Originally Posted By: DonkeyHotTea
Originally Posted By: Jim Cunneen
Originally Posted By: Father Jack
Originally Posted By: Steph

As for Ossie's yellow that really was a bad misjudgement. The ref was a long way behind the play at that time and may have seen it differently from me. I saw Ossie go in hard and determined but fairly for a 50-50 ball. At it was the keeper, who at the time was a normal outfield player as he was out of the area and could not handle the ball, got there first and kicked the ball away. The keeper, who was equally determined, went down before Ossie reached him and Ossie's momentum on the wet pitch carried him through. There was no injury as i recall and the goalie was not hurt. You could say it was a foul but a yellow. Football is not a non-contact sport.



Slight flaw in your argument Steph..... Foster wasn't cautioned.


...and Iwould confirm that!!


I'd be more surprised if you didn't confirm it as Father jack is your source of information too!


Not entirely....

Where some doubt arises i use other sources to confirm details as it is important to get things right....

Then FJ and i chat....

In this case there was no need as FJ's information was, as usual, reliable...
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Better late than never I was always told and some are here just for the back ground singing.

 

 

 

http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=-X_GeTcADLs

 

http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=I8Dwe8Gz-D8

 

http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=-X_GeTcADLs

 

http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=NGaTYwNAQf8

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...